Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-server --skill add-servicegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-server/add-service)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-server/add-service"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-server/add-service/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-server/add-service"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-server/add-service.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.03357 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01679 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00671 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00336 |
Grade A, and why
add-service scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to add-service — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
Services use the init/accessor pattern: initialized once in createApp's setup() callback, then accessed at request time via a lazy getter. Each service lives in src/services/[domain]/ with an init function and accessor.
Service methods receive Context for correlated logging (ctx.log) and tenant-scoped storage (ctx.state). Convention: ctx.requestInput should only be called from tool, resource, and prompt handlers, not from services — a service can call it, but the never return means TypeScript cannot narrow across it at the handler's call site.
For the full service pattern, CoreServices, and Context interface, read the framework's CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md (loaded at session start).
Steps
- Gather the service domain name and what it integrates with from the user's request — ask only if genuinely absent
- Create the directory at
src/services/{{domain}}/ - Create the service file at
src/services/{{domain}}/{{domain}}-service.ts - Create types at
src/services/{{domain}}/types.tsif needed - Register in
setup()in the server's entry point (src/index.ts, orsrc/worker.tsfor Worker-only servers) - Run
bun run devcheckto verify
Template
Service file
/**
* @fileoverview {{SERVICE_DESCRIPTION}}
* @module services/{{domain}}/{{domain}}-service
*/
import type { AppConfig } from '@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/config';
import type { StorageService } from '@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core/storage';
import type { Context } from '@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core';
export class {{ServiceName}} {
constructor(
private readonly config: AppConfig,
private readonly storage: StorageService,
) {}
async doWork(input: string, ctx: Context): Promise<string> {
ctx.log.debug('Processing', { input });
// Domain logic here
return `result: ${input}`;
}
}
// --- Init/accessor pattern ---
let _service: {{ServiceName}} | undefined;
export function init{{ServiceName}}(config: AppConfig, storage: StorageService): void {
_service = new {{ServiceName}}(config, storage);
}
export function get{{ServiceName}}(): {{ServiceName}} {
if (!_service) {
throw new Error('{{ServiceName}} not initialized — call init{{ServiceName}}() in setup()');
}
return _service;
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 299 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A d7bb570e0a0f
add-service is a skill published in the GitHub repository cyanheads/sanctions-screening-mcp-server (1 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 3,357 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to add-service, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
deepai-assistant
Use this skill when an agent is helping a developer build, debug, or review a deepidv integration.
regtech-expert
Expert in regulatory technology, compliance automation, KYC/AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, and automated reporting. Use when the user mentions compliance, KYC, AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, or regulatory reporting, or when the task involves KYC/AML Compliance, KYC/AML Program, Regulatory…
onboarding
Full KYC customer onboarding with mandatory Step 0 independent verification (5+1 searches), 17 sequential stagegates requiring explicit analyst consent, deterministic four-factor risk scoring, case folder auto-creation, 4-sheet Excel dashboard, 17-section PDF report, and immutable audit trail. Covers UK/EU (AMLD5), US…
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
screening
Comprehensive sanctions and PEP screening against 12+ databases (OFAC, EU, UK, UN, INTERPOL) with false positive assessment, HITL decision gates, and regulatory-compliant documentation.
refresh
Periodic customer refresh with re-verification of original due diligence to detect material changes and maintain compliance with ongoing due diligence requirements. Triggers include time-based review (annual HIGH risk, 2-3 year intervals for MEDIUM/LOW), risk-based escalation (score changes, business pivots), and…