Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/intent-classifiernpx skills add d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents --skill intent-classifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/intent-classifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/intent-classifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents/intent-classifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00082 | $0.00951 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00476 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
intent-classifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Intent Classifier
Classify user requests and route them to the most appropriate skill, command, or specialized agent.
When to Use
- User asks which skill to use or how to route a request
- Need to determine which skill handles a given task
- Multiple skills could handle a request and disambiguation is needed
- Even if they just say "which skill should I use" or "route this"
Classification Workflow
1. Intent Extraction
- Parse the user's natural language request
- Identify primary action (create, update, delete, analyze, etc.)
- Extract entities (file paths, technologies, specific terms)
2. Skill Matching
- Compare against available skills catalog
- Score match confidence for each candidate
- Consider skill descriptions and keywords
3. Route Decision
- Select highest-confidence match
- Handle ties and ambiguous cases
- Fall back to general assistance if no match
Classification Rules
Priority Order
- Exact keyword match - Skill description contains exact phrase
- Domain match - Technology stack alignment
- Action match - Verb/action alignment
- Context match - File paths, extensions, surrounding context
Confidence Scoring
High (0.8-1.0): Exact description match, multiple keyword hits
Medium (0.5-0.7): Partial match, related domain
Low (0.3-0.4): Weak match, shared keywords only
None (<0.3): No relevant match
Multi-Intent Handling
When a request contains multiple intents:
- Sequential - Chain skills in dependency order
- Parallel - Execute independent skills simultaneously
- Composite - Use parent skill that orchestrates sub-skills
Fallback Strategies
| Confidence | Action |
|---|---|
| > 0.7 | Execute primary skill |
| 0.5 - 0.7 | Execute skill with confirmation |
| 0.3 - 0.5 | Present top 2-3 options to user |
| < 0.3 | Use general assistance |
Dynamic Catalog
Update the skill catalog using:
./scripts/dynamic-catalog.sh
This scans .agents/skills/ and regenerates the skill registry with:
- Skill names and descriptions
- Keywords extracted from descriptions
- Compatibility requirements
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 125 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 6a2d4cfb7bcf
intent-classifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 951 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
omh-image-cards
This is a Hermes-native img-summary workflow skill.
omh-accessibility-audit
This is a Hermes-native accessibility-audit workflow skill.
omh-backend
This is a Hermes-native backend workflow skill.
omh-design-quality-gate
This is a Hermes-native design-quality-gate workflow skill.
omh-failure-signal-audit
This is a Hermes-native failure-signal-audit workflow skill.
omh-agent-board
This is a Hermes-native agent-board workflow skill.