Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dancenitra/agora/audit-postnpx skills add DanceNitra/agora --skill audit-postgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DanceNitra/agoraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dancenitra/agora/audit-post)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dancenitra/agora/audit-post"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dancenitra/agora/audit-post.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02917 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01458 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00583 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00292 |
Grade A, and why
audit-post scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit-Post — the ONE correct, unskippable procedure for auditing a published post
What this is
The end-to-end procedure for auditing one already-published post to a scientific-organization standard. It chains the adversarial skills and — critically — re-runs the auditor on the CORRECTED post to confirm it now passes clean before committing. We are a scientific organization; we do not ship missteps. Run EVERY step, in order, for EVERY post. No light/inline version. Fewer posts done FULLY > more done shallow.
Defined 2026-06-29 after the owner caught two failures: (1) shortening the audit to a single citation verifier + inline reasoning (missed a "Bayesian" mislabel, a strawman baseline, a wrong-estimand, and a "textbook dressed as our law" overclaim across posts #7–#10); (2) dropping the re-audit-after-fix step — I fixed and committed WITHOUT re-running the auditor on the corrected post to confirm the fix is clean.
Updated 2026-07-01 after a THIRD failure: audits #16–#19 all ran stress-claim + verify-claims but never ran storm-research at all, because this file — written 2026-06-29 — predates the owner's 2026-07-01 PERMANENT standing gate ("VALIDATE → STORM → AUDIT → VERIFY, storm is dominant, never skip, applies to everything not just flagship posts"). The gate overrides every skill file by design, but relying on remembering an overriding rule from a different document is exactly the failure mode that gate exists to prevent. STORM is now Step 3 below, hard-coded into the numbered procedure itself — not something to recall from memory. If a future owner rule changes the required order again, update this file itself, don't leave the gap for the model to bridge silently.
Updated again 2026-07-01, SAME DAY after a FOURTH failure, caught within an hour of the third: the "run the /seo Mode-A check" instruction was a clause buried inside a bigger step (old step 6, mixed in with bilingual-fix instructions), and in practice it was never actually executed as a distinct checklist pass on audit #19 — I made ad-hoc meta/JSON-LD/internal-link edits without running the LLM-summary self-test, without checking the Three Kings against the char-length rules, and without requesting re-indexing. Writing a step into a paragraph is not the same as writing it as a step. SEO validation is now its own numbered step (7), with the specific /seo Mode-A checklist items spelled out inline so there's no clause to skim past. Pattern to notice going forward: if a "run X" instruction is a sub-clause of a different step instead of its own step, that's the shape of thing that gets silently skipped — split it out.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 151 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f55f0480515d
audit-post is a skill published in the GitHub repository DanceNitra/agora (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,917 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
calculator
Evaluate mathematical expressions and unit conversions. Handles arithmetic, percentages, exponents, and common unit conversions (temperature, distance, weight). No external dependencies.
run-aeon-benchmark
Use when asked to run, benchmark, evaluate, or score an LLM with AEON Bench. You run the AEON Bench Pod on the user's machine, point it at a model, run the benchmark, and submit the signed result to the public leaderboard at aeon-bench.com. All work happens on the pod. The mothership only shows the board and accepts…
Evaluation
Frames model, prompt, and system evaluation as a reproducible experiment with baselines, datasets, and explicit metrics.
systematic-literature-review
Systematic literature review across multiple arXiv papers.
arxiv
Search arXiv papers by keyword, author, category, or ID.
cuopt-numerical-optimization-formulation
LP, MILP, QP — concepts, problem-text parsing, and formulation patterns (parameters, constraints, decisions, objective). Concepts only; no API.