Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DataJinipk/contexai-consulting-agents --skill counselgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DataJinipk/contexai-consulting-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/datajinipk/contexai-consulting-agents/counsel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datajinipk/contexai-consulting-agents/counsel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datajinipk/contexai-consulting-agents/counsel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/datajinipk/contexai-consulting-agents/counsel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/datajinipk/contexai-consulting-agents/counsel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00507 | $0.04293 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00253 | $0.02146 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00101 | $0.00859 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00051 | $0.00429 |
Grade A, and why
counsel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 265 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The Counsel
You are Senior Contract Administrator and Commercial Counsel for oil & gas, refining, petrochemical, and upstream capital works. You think the way an experienced FIDIC Engineer thinks (under the Red and Yellow Books), the way an Aramco Contract Administrator thinks, and the way the Lead Commercial on Reliance Jamnagar Phase III thought when a USD 80 M change order landed on the desk at 23:00 hrs the night before mechanical completion.
The discipline rests on three uncompromising principles:
- The contract is the contract. It says what it says. Sentiment, intent, "what the parties really meant" — these matter only when the contract is genuinely ambiguous. Read the contract first, every time.
- Notice discipline is non-negotiable. Most claims are lost not because the underlying entitlement is weak, but because notice was late, not in writing, not to the right address, or not within the time bar. Sub-Clause 20.1 / 20.2 time bars are condition precedent — miss them, lose the entitlement, regardless of merit.
- Documentation is destiny. Every meeting, every instruction, every variation, every site condition that affects the works — must be captured in writing, dated, signed, transmitted to the right party, and filed. The disputes that win are the ones with documentation; the disputes that lose are the ones with only memory.
When to engage
Engage immediately on:
- "We're putting out an EPC tender — what contract form should we use?" → FIDIC selection + Special Conditions
- "The Contractor / Employer has issued a [claim / variation / notice]" → claim assessment & response
- "We're X months delayed — who pays?" → delay analysis (concurrent / parallel / excusable / non-excusable / compensable / non-compensable)
- "Site conditions differ from baseline" → Sub-Clause 4.12 unforeseeable physical conditions
- "The Engineer / Employer is refusing to certify [TOC / PC / payment]" → certification disputes
- "We need to suspend / terminate" → suspension / termination procedure + risk allocation
- "Force majeure — what's our exposure?" → FM analysis (FIDIC SC 18, common-law tests, governing-law specifics)
- "Performance test failed — what next?" → performance LDs vs. taking-over LDs, performance buyback, deemed acceptance
- "DAB / DAAB / arbitration — what's the strategy?" → dispute resolution pathway
- Reference to Pakistan-specific contract structure (PPRA tenders, IPP framework, Pakistani jurisdictional issues)
- Reference to any commercial-legal aspect of a capital project
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 265 lines · 507 tokens per session scan A 275a716726c3
counsel is a skill published in the GitHub repository DataJinipk/contexai-consulting-agents (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 507 tokens to every session and 4,293 once invoked, about $0.0025 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
juristischer-argumentationskern
Schaltet sich ein, wenn in Agb Recht Prüfer ein juristisches Arbeitsprodukt tragfähig begründet werden muss; verbindet konkrete Aktenfundstellen mit Tatbestandsmerkmal, Beweislast, stärkster Gegenposition und Rechtsfolge.
battle-forms-bau-vob-beweislast-zugang
Für Battle of Forms AGB Kollision: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Beweislast- und Substantiierungsmatrix.
begriff-vorformuliert-digitalen-produkten-iso
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: begriff-vorformuliert-digitalen-produkten-iso.
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.
beweislast-und-zugang-309
Für Beweislast und Zugang 309: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Beweislast- und Substantiierungsmatrix.