Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Deep-Identity-Inc/agent-skills --skill deepidv-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Deep-Identity-Inc/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deep-identity-inc/agent-skills/deepidv-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deep-identity-inc/agent-skills/deepidv-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deep-identity-inc/agent-skills/deepidv-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deep-identity-inc/agent-skills/deepidv-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deep-identity-inc/agent-skills/deepidv-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.04862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.02431 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00972 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00486 |
Grade A, and why
deepidv-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 519 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
deepidv Verify Skill
Use this skill when an agent needs to verify a person, validate identity media, or run compliance screening through the public deepidv Verify API.
Capabilities Overview
Available capabilities:
- Face liveness
- Identity verification
- Deepfake detection
- Adverse media screening
- AML and sanctions screening
- Combined verification
Agents can discover this skill directly from this repository.
Invocation Guidance
Choose the endpoint that matches the user intent directly:
| User Intent | Endpoint |
|---|---|
| Start a new applicant verification flow | POST /v1/sessions |
| Find existing sessions by creator, organization, workflow, or external ID | GET /v1/sessions |
| Inspect the full outcome of one verification session | GET /v1/sessions/{id} |
| Manually resolve a session as approved or rejected | PATCH /v1/sessions/{id}/update-status |
| Create a new basic workflow for later session launches | POST /v1/workflows |
| Discover which workflows are available and which steps they include | GET /v1/workflows |
| Inspect the exact steps configured in one workflow | GET /v1/workflows/{id} |
| Run a synchronous PEP and sanctions screening | POST /v1/screening/pep-sanctions |
| Run a synchronous title or ownership search | POST /v1/screening/title-check |
| Queue an asynchronous adverse-media screening | POST /v1/screening/adverse-media |
| Poll an adverse-media job until it completes | GET /v1/async-jobs/{jobId} |
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/assets/deepidv-dark.svg 11 KB
- agents/assets/deepidv-light.svg 9.9 KB
- agents/assets/icon.svg 178 KB
- agents/openai.yaml 256 B
- assets/deepidv-dark.svg 11 KB
- assets/deepidv-light.svg 9.9 KB
- assets/favicon.ico 4.3 KB
- assets/icon.png 4.0 KB
- references/api-reference.md 12 KB
- references/error-codes.md 7.4 KB
- references/rate-limits.md 2.5 KB
- scripts/verify.sh 7.2 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 519 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 46fd36418ae0
deepidv-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository Deep-Identity-Inc/agent-skills (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 4,862 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
regtech-expert
Expert in regulatory technology, compliance automation, KYC/AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, and automated reporting. Use when the user mentions compliance, KYC, AML, transaction monitoring, risk assessment, or regulatory reporting, or when the task involves KYC/AML Compliance, KYC/AML Program, Regulatory…
onboarding
Full KYC customer onboarding with mandatory Step 0 independent verification (5+1 searches), 17 sequential stagegates requiring explicit analyst consent, deterministic four-factor risk scoring, case folder auto-creation, 4-sheet Excel dashboard, 17-section PDF report, and immutable audit trail. Covers UK/EU (AMLD5), US…
risk-assessment
Deterministic heuristic risk scoring using a four-factor weighted model (Geographic 30%, Customer 35%, Product 25%, Channel 10%) aligned with Basel III, EBA Guidelines, FATF standards, and FinCEN guidance. Bands: LOW (0-20), MEDIUM (21-60), HIGH (61-80), CRITICAL (81-100).
screening
Comprehensive sanctions and PEP screening against 12+ databases (OFAC, EU, UK, UN, INTERPOL) with false positive assessment, HITL decision gates, and regulatory-compliant documentation.
refresh
Periodic customer refresh with re-verification of original due diligence to detect material changes and maintain compliance with ongoing due diligence requirements. Triggers include time-based review (annual HIGH risk, 2-3 year intervals for MEDIUM/LOW), risk-based escalation (score changes, business pivots), and…
transaction-monitoring
AML transaction monitoring for ongoing customer relationships. Identifies suspicious patterns including structuring, layering, and unusual activity. Assesses against regulatory thresholds and prepares Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with HITL decision gates.