Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01011 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
Delphi Code Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- code-review — 95% identical, 4 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Delphi Code Review — Skill
Quick Checklist
Corretude
- Code does what it's supposed to do
- Edge cases handled (nil, empty list, zero value)
- Error handling implemented with specific exceptions
- No obvious bugs
Security
- Parameterized SQL queries (without string concatenation)
- Validated and sanitized input
- No hardcoded credentials or passwords
- No SQL injection via
Formator concatenation in queries
Performance
- No N+1 queries (avoid loop with query inside)
- No unnecessary loops
- Large objects released as early as possible
-
TObjectListwithOwnsObjectsconfigured correctly
Code Quality
- Self-descriptive names following Pascal Guide
- DRY — no duplicate code
- SOLID — principles respected
- Methods ≤ 20 lines
- Guard clauses instead of deep nesting
Memory Management
-
try/finallywithFreefor temporary objects - Interfaces for automatic reference counting
-
Assigned()before accessing references that may be nil - Destructor
Destroywithoverridefreeing owned fields - No memory leaks in exception paths
Pascal Nomenclature
- PascalCase for all identifiers
- Prefix
Tin classes,Iin interfaces,Ein exceptions - Prefix
Fin private fields,Ain parameters,Lin local variables - Units:
Projeto.Camada.Dominio.Funcionalidade.pas - Components: 3-letter prefix (
btn,edt,lbl, etc.)
Tests
- Unit tests for new code
- Edge cases tested
- Readable and maintainable tests
Documentation
- XMLDoc for public methods and properties
- Comments in Portuguese when necessary
- Do not comment self-explanatory code
Anti-Patterns to Flag
//❌ Magic numbers
if ACustomer.Age > 18 then
//✅ Named constants
const MINIMUM_AGE = 18;
if ACustomer.Age > MINIMUM_AGE then
//❌ with statement
with AQuery do begin
SQL.Text := '...';
Open;
end;
//✅ Explicit reference
AQuery.SQL.Text := '...';
AQuery.Open;
//❌ Generic Catch
except
on E: Exception do ShowMessage(E.Message);
//✅ Specific exceptions
except
on E: EFDDBEngineException do
raise EDatabaseException.Create('Falha: ' + E.Message);
//❌ Logic in OnClick
procedure TfrmMain.btnSaveClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
//50 lines of business logic here
end;
//✅ Delegate for Service
procedure TfrmMain.btnSaveClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
FService.SaveCustomer(GetFormData);
end;
// ❌ Memory leak
function GetItems: TStringList;
begin
Result := TStringList.Create;
LoadItems(Result); //if LoadItems throws exception, leak!
end;
//✅ Safe
function GetItems: TStringList;
begin
Result := TStringList.Create;
try
LoadItems(Result);
except
Result.Free;
raise;
end;
end;
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A b88700832590
Delphi Code Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository delphicleancode/delphi-spec-kit (56 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,011 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
fold-findings
Repair persisted fix-now findings in compatible atomic batches: root-cause fixes, green gate, commit/push, and per-row folded: yes updates. Never reclassify or substitute backlog notes. Triggers: "fold-findings", "fix the review findings", "repair audit blockers".
review-change
Review a change with only applicable internal axes, classify every finding, persist fix-now work, and return one evidence-backed decision. Findings only; --adversarial N uses isolated reviewers; --synthesize fuses supplied reviewer tables. Triggers: "review-change", "review this change", "adversarial review".
review-perf
Internal performance review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed paths for algorithmic and resource regressions: N+1s, hot-path allocations, asset weight, and leaks. Findings only; never edits code.
review-code
Internal correctness + simplification review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks correctness, error handling, duplication, dead code, and simplification opportunities against the project's own conventions. Findings only; never edits…
review-debt
Internal tech-debt transform pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Transforms the synthesized findings table into explicit debt items, each with a re-trigger condition; it does not rescan the diff. Findings only; never edits code.