Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SecondLifes/delphi-expert --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SecondLifes/delphi-expertWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/secondlifes/delphi-expert/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/secondlifes/delphi-expert/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/secondlifes/delphi-expert/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/secondlifes/delphi-expert/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/secondlifes/delphi-expert/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01049 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00420 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00210 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to Delphi Code Review — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Delphi Code Review — Skill
Quick Checklist
Corretude
- Code does what it's supposed to do
- Edge cases handled (nil, empty list, zero value)
- Error handling implemented with specific exceptions
- No obvious bugs
Security
- Parameterized SQL queries (without string concatenation)
- Validated and sanitized input
- No hardcoded credentials or passwords
- No SQL injection via
Formator concatenation in queries
Performance
- No N+1 queries (avoid loop with query inside)
- No unnecessary loops
- Large objects released as early as possible
-
TObjectListwithOwnsObjectsconfigured correctly
Code Quality
- Self-descriptive names following Pascal Guide
- DRY — no duplicate code
- SOLID — principles respected
- Methods ≤ 20 lines
- Guard clauses instead of deep nesting
Memory Management
-
try/finallywithFreefor temporary objects - Interfaces for automatic reference counting
-
Assigned()before accessing references that may be nil - Destructor
Destroywithoverridefreeing owned fields - No memory leaks in exception paths
Pascal Nomenclature
- PascalCase for all identifiers
- Prefix
Tin classes,Iin interfaces,Ein exceptions - Prefix
Fin private fields,Ain parameters,Lin local variables - Units:
Projeto.Camada.Dominio.Funcionalidade.pas - Components: 3-letter prefix (
btn,edt,lbl, etc.)
Tests
- Unit tests for new code
- Edge cases tested
- Readable and maintainable tests
Documentation
- XMLDoc for public methods and properties
- Comments in Portuguese when necessary
- Do not comment self-explanatory code
Anti-Patterns to Flag
//❌ Magic numbers
if ACustomer.Age > 18 then
//✅ Named constants
const MINIMUM_AGE = 18;
if ACustomer.Age > MINIMUM_AGE then
//❌ with statement
with AQuery do begin
SQL.Text := '...';
Open;
end;
//✅ Explicit reference
AQuery.SQL.Text := '...';
AQuery.Open;
//❌ Generic Catch
except
on E: Exception do ShowMessage(E.Message);
//✅ Specific exceptions
except
on E: EFDDBEngineException do
raise EDatabaseException.Create('Falha: ' + E.Message);
//❌ Logic in OnClick
procedure TfrmMain.btnSaveClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
//50 lines of business logic here
end;
//✅ Delegate for Service
procedure TfrmMain.btnSaveClick(Sender: TObject);
begin
FService.SaveCustomer(GetFormData);
end;
// ❌ Memory leak
function GetItems: TStringList;
begin
Result := TStringList.Create;
LoadItems(Result); //if LoadItems throws exception, leak!
end;
//✅ Safe
function GetItems: TStringList;
begin
Result := TStringList.Create;
try
LoadItems(Result);
except
Result.Free;
raise;
end;
end;
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A db65a053dd1b
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SecondLifes/delphi-expert (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,049 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to Delphi Code Review, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…