Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add deltadbu/WIT-skill --skill witgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/deltadbu/WIT-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/deltadbu/wit-skill/wit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deltadbu/wit-skill/wit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deltadbu/wit-skill/wit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/deltadbu/wit-skill/wit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/deltadbu/wit-skill/wit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.02709 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.01084 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00542 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00271 |
Grade A, and why
wit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- case-studies/Applying-WIT-to-MSFold-cn.md 33 KB
- case-studies/Applying-WIT-to-MSFold.md 34 KB
- case-studies/README.md 85 B
- README.md 132 B
- references/WIT-Scientific-thinking-and-writing-skill.md 67 KB
- references/WIT-科学思考及写作skill.md 66 KB
- tests/Assess-WIT-using-AlphaDev-cn.md 8.3 KB
- tests/Assess-WIT-using-AlphaDev.md 8.3 KB
- tests/Assess-WIT-using-AlphaGo-cn.md 15 KB
- tests/Assess-WIT-using-AlphaGo.md 17 KB
- tests/README.md 81 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 2c58572aa4bb
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 45dc6b2a118c
wit is a skill published in the GitHub repository deltadbu/WIT-skill (39 stars, last pushed 26d ago), with no licence file. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 2,709 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
academic-paper-review
Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation.…
agent-matrix-optimizer
Agent skill for matrix-optimizer - invoke with $agent-matrix-optimizer.
cnsplots
Create, revise, and troubleshoot publication-ready scientific plots in Python with cnsplots, including distribution, regression, heatmap, genomics, survival, set, flow, and multi-panel figures. Use when a user asks for cnsplots code, Cell/Nature/Science-style visualization, precise physical figure dimensions…
good-question
Use when a researcher is choosing, framing, refining, or stress-testing a research question, hypothesis, thesis topic, project idea, grant direction, paper angle, or stalled research direction.
medical-agent
Build medical AI agents for clinical decision support, medical record summarization, diagnostic assistance, and healthcare workflow automation.
agentsop-bio-fraud-forensics
Screens biomedical / life-science papers for signs of data fabrication, image manipulation, and statistical anomalies, using the detection techniques distilled from the field's canonical exposure platforms (PubPeer, Data Colada, Science Integrity Digest, For Better Science) and tools (ImageTwin/Proofig, statcheck…