Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/agentsope/skillalchemy/agentsop-bio-fraud-forensicsnpx skills add agentsope/SkillAlchemy --skill agentsop-bio-fraud-forensicsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agentsope/SkillAlchemyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00167 | $0.02990 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00084 | $0.01495 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00598 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00299 |
Grade A, and why
agentsop-bio-fraud-forensics scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bio-Fraud Forensics · 生物医学论文数据造假筛查
A screening methodology for life-science papers. It reverse-engineers how real cases were caught — the exact panels compared, the transform applied, the statistic recomputed — and turns that into a reproducible per-paper checklist. It is a detective's lens, not a verdict machine: every output stays at "observed anomaly" or "question for the authors," because red flag ≠ proof and an accusation can end a career.
Activation Rules
Trigger when:
- "Check this paper / figure / Western blot for manipulation," "does this data look faked," "screen for image duplication."
- A user shares a figure, blot, microscopy panel, supplementary
.xlsx, or a DOI and asks if it's trustworthy. - "Is this a paper mill?", "tortured phrases," "are these statistics possible," "run GRIM/statcheck on this."
- "Where do I check if this paper has been flagged / retracted?" (verification routing).
- Asked to draft a PubPeer-grade, reproducible image/data integrity comment.
Do NOT trigger when:
- The user wants a scientific peer review of validity/novelty (use a peer-review skill) rather than an integrity screen.
- The user asks you to publicly accuse a named person of fraud, or to write an accusation/social post (refuse — see Boundary Rules).
- The task is general statistics help or figure-making with no integrity question.
- The paper is non-biomedical and the request is about a domain whose fraud signatures differ (physics/CS); say so and scope down.
Agentic Protocol
Run this as a chain-of-steps. Cheapest, fastest signals first; the expensive image/stat forensics last (they tell you where to dig is often answered for free by the cheap checks).
Step 1 — Scope & status. Identify the input: single figure, full paper, supplementary dataset, or a batch. Run the status cascade in parallel (it's free and may hand you the answer): Retraction Watch Database → PubMed retraction banner → Crossref/Crossmark notice → PubPeer (search DOI/author) → ORI case index (only if adjudicated US PHS misconduct is the question). Note what already exists; your job may shift to verifying/extending a prior flag.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/demo_screening.md 4.2 KB
- README.md 2.9 KB
- references/R01-misconduct-taxonomy.md 20 KB
- references/R02-image-forensics.md 19 KB
- references/R03-statistical-forensics.md 19 KB
- references/R04-exposure-sites-method.md 21 KB
- references/R05-evidence-red-lines.md 21 KB
- references/R06-screening-workflow.md 22 KB
- references/R07-paper-mill-signals.md 20 KB
- references/research_notes.md 7.9 KB
- references/sop_models.md 17 KB
- USAGE.md 8.3 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 137 lines · 167 tokens per session scan A 299d4d5bb4eb
agentsop-bio-fraud-forensics is a skill published in the GitHub repository agentsope/SkillAlchemy (342 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 167 tokens to every session and 2,990 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
shellgames
Play board games on ShellGames.ai — Chess, Poker, Ludo, Tycoon, Memory, and Spymaster. Use when the agent wants to play games against humans or other AI agents, join tournaments, chat with players, check leaderboards, or manage a ShellGames account. Triggers on "play chess/poker/ludo/memory", "shellgames", "join…
curl-search
Web search using curl + multiple search engines (Baidu, Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo). Activates when user asks to search, look up, or query something online. Includes security enhancements: input sanitization, command injection protection, and URL encoding.
skills-vote-local
Use when retrieving the most relevant skills from a local or private skill library instead of relying on network-based skill discovery.
Bulk RNAseq differential expression (DeSeq2)
Core DESeq2 workflow for RNA-seq differential expression analysis with count data.
Single-Cell RNA-seq Core Analysis (Seurat)
Complete workflow for single-cell RNA-seq analysis using Seurat v5. Process raw data through quality control, normalization, clustering, and cell type annotation with publication-ready visualizations.
Bulk Omics Clustering Analysis
Systematic workflow for clustering biological samples, features, or any quantitative data matrix. Implements multiple clustering algorithms with rigorous validation, comparison, and interpretation to identify meaningful data groupings.