Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skills --skill local-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skills/local-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skills/local-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skills/local-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skills/local-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skills/local-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00139 | $0.04430 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00056 | $0.01772 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00886 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00443 |
Grade A, and why
local-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Local Code & Technical Review (local-code-review)
Conducts a high-signal, multi-dimensional review of code, tests, documentation, configuration, and visual diagrams in any local workspace—whether hosted on GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, or not yet under version control.
Supports two operating modes:
- Mode A — Diff / Change Review: Reviews uncommitted work, staged diffs, a feature branch, or a specific commit range.
- Mode B — Whole-Codebase / Module Audit: Reviews an entire repository, package, or directory from top to bottom without relying on Git diffs.
Table of Contents
- Triggers
- Review Workflow
- Mode A: Diff / Change Discovery
- Mode B: Whole-Codebase / Module Discovery
- Review Standards & Five-Axis Evaluation
- Structural Remedies & Hygiene
- Change Sizing & Splitting Heuristics
- Critical Anti-Hallucination Guardrails
- Output Format
Triggers
Activate this skill whenever:
- The user asks for a local code review, diff review, branch review, or pre-commit / pre-push review.
- The user asks to review the whole codebase, audit a repository, or review a specific module/directory.
- You or another agent have completed a non-trivial feature, refactor, or bug fix and need a structured quality gate before committing or merging.
- The user pastes a diff inline or asks to review changes in a project that does not use GitHub Actions (e.g. Bitbucket or local repositories).
Review Workflow
Copy and follow this checklist in order:
Local Review Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Select review mode (Mode A: Diff Review vs Mode B: Whole-Codebase Audit) and gather target files
- [ ] Step 2: Load repository rules, core documentation, and architectural context
- [ ] Step 3: Evaluate tests, documentation alignment, and visual assets
- [ ] Step 4: Perform the Five-Axis Evaluation & check structural remedies
- [ ] Step 5: Verify findings against actual file contents on disk (anti-hallucination pass)
- [ ] Step 6: Present severity-ranked review and offer to apply fixes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 275 lines · 139 tokens per session scan A 0e420c9cc66a
local-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository derailed-dash/dazbo-agent-skills (26 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 139 tokens to every session and 4,430 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
fw-review
Full Freshworks marketplace app review — iparams, frontend, serverless, FDK, security, and structured text report output — in one skill.
oma-team-verify
Run sealed checks and collect independent reviews one small section at a time.
refactor-with-ai
Use this skill when refactoring code with AI assistance. Activate when the user wants to improve code structure, extract functions, reduce complexity, modernize legacy code, apply design patterns, clean up technical debt, or restructure code while preserving behavior.
ai-code-reviewer
Use this skill when reviewing AI-generated code. Activate when the user has code generated by an AI assistant and wants to review it, validate AI output, check for common AI mistakes, ensure code quality of generated code, or verify that AI-generated code follows best practices before merging.
secure-code-review
Systematic security code review methodology. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests for security issues, auditing critical code paths, or performing security assessments. Activate when: security review, code audit, secure code, review PR for security, find vulnerabilities, security assessment.
agent-code-analyzer
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer.