Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/djscheuf/agentic-dev-ecosystem-template/write-minimal-implementationnpx skills add djscheuf/agentic-dev-ecosystem-template --skill write-minimal-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/djscheuf/agentic-dev-ecosystem-templateWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00966 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00483 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
write-minimal-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow Steps
Step 1: Analyze the Failure
Review the test failure:
- What class/method is missing?
- What behavior is not implemented?
- What's the simplest fix?
Step 2: Write Minimal Implementation
CRITICAL: Write ONLY enough code to pass the test.
Acceptable approaches:
- Return a hardcoded value
- Implement the simplest algorithm
- Add the minimal structure needed
FORBIDDEN:
- Implementing features not tested
- Adding error handling not tested
- Optimizing prematurely
- Adding "obvious" code paths
Step 3: Make It Compile
If the test fails due to missing types/methods:
1. Create the class/interface if missing
2. Add method signatures with minimal body
3. Return default/hardcoded values initially
Example progression:
// Step 1: Make it compile
public class Calculator
{
public int Add(int a, int b) => 0; // Just compile
}
// Step 2: Make it pass
public class Calculator
{
public int Add(int a, int b) => 5; // Hardcoded for first test
}
Step 4: Run the Test
Execute ONLY the specific test:
- dotnet test --filter "TestName"
- pytest -k "test_name"
- npm test -- --grep "test name"
Verify:
✓ The specific test now passes
✓ No compilation errors
✓ Test passes for the right reason
// TODO - Add Run-Test Skill specific to the project's testing framework, supporting that projects structure.
Step 5: Run All Tests
Ensure no regressions:
- Run the entire test suite
- All tests should pass
- If any test fails, fix immediately
If new failures appear:
- Your change broke something
- Revert and reconsider approach
- Smaller steps needed
// TODO - Add Run-Test Skill specific to the project's testing framework, supporting that projects structure, and specifically declares how to run all of a projects/subprojects tests.
Step 6: Document the Success
Update the test plan and mark that test as "passing".
Step 7: Write the Sentinel File
- create a sentinel file in the
.processdirectory, named{skill-name}.done.json. - the sentinel file will follow @/schema/sentinel.schema.json.
- set the task field to "{skill-name}".
- the verify_params of the sentinel file will follow @/schema/verify-params.schema.json.
- set the verify_params as follows:
- set "test_cases_path" to the path of the test cases file relative to repo root.
- set "failing_test_path" to the path of the failing test file relative to repo root.
- set "failing_test_name" to the name of the failing test.
- set "changed_code_files" to an array of paths to all the changed code files relative to repo root.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 142 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A cfa080dca801
write-minimal-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository djscheuf/agentic-dev-ecosystem-template (12 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 966 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.