template: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/advanced-evaluation/SKILL.md

advanced-evaluation is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from docxology/template. It costs 44 tokens per session (3,543 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of advanced-evaluation, Apache-2.0.

Guidance for evaluating language-model outputs with language models acting as judges. It covers scoring, pairwise comparison, rubrics, confidence, bias, and calibration.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build or improve systems that grade model responses, compare prompts or models, run evaluation tests, or align automated judgments with human reviews.
Why use it?
It helps make automated quality judgments more consistent and easier to compare. This addresses common problems such as unclear scoring rules and evaluator bias.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is docxology/template's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on template itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything template configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to docxology/template. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docxology/template/main/.agents/skills/advanced-evaluation/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/docxology/template

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for advanced-evaluation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/template/advanced-evaluation/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/template/advanced-evaluation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/template/advanced-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/template/advanced-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for advanced-evaluation

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/docxology/template/advanced-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/docxology/template/advanced-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,543 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.03543
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.01417
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00709
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00354

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 8b9e3d9de07a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

advanced-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/evaluation_example.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to advanced-evaluation — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/advanced-evaluation/SKILL.md · 410 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 410 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Advanced Evaluation

This skill covers production-grade techniques for evaluating LLM outputs using LLMs as judges. It synthesizes research from academic papers, industry practices, and practical implementation experience into actionable patterns for building reliable evaluation systems.

Key insight: LLM-as-a-Judge is not a single technique but a family of approaches, each suited to different evaluation contexts. Choosing the right approach and mitigating known biases is the core competency this skill develops.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when:

  • Building LLM-as-judge systems for LLM outputs
  • Comparing multiple model responses to select the best one
  • Establishing consistent quality standards across evaluation teams
  • Debugging evaluation systems that show inconsistent results
  • Designing A/B tests for prompt or model changes
  • Creating rubrics specifically for LLM or human/LLM hybrid judges
  • Analyzing correlation between automated and human judgments

Do not activate this skill for adjacent work owned by other skills:

  • General deterministic checks, regression suites, production quality gates, or outcome metrics: evaluation.
  • Autonomous loop governance, locked rubrics, rollback, or PR approval boundaries: harness-engineering.
  • Tool API contracts for evaluation tools: tool-design.

Core Concepts

The Evaluation Taxonomy

Select between two primary approaches based on whether ground truth exists:

Direct Scoring — Use when objective criteria exist (factual accuracy, instruction following, toxicity). A single LLM rates one response on a defined scale. Achieves moderate-to-high reliability for well-defined criteria. Watch for score calibration drift and inconsistent scale interpretation.

Pairwise Comparison — Use for subjective preferences (tone, style, persuasiveness). An LLM compares two responses and selects the better one. Pairwise methods often correlate better with human preference than open-ended direct scoring for subjective tasks (claim-advanced-evaluation-position-swap). Watch for position bias and length bias.

Read the full file on GitHub · 410 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 410 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 8b9e3d9de07a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

advanced-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository docxology/template (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,543 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to advanced-evaluation, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

bioinformatics-scientist

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bioinformatics Scientist — designing a differential-expression or GWAS analysis with correct multiple-testing correction, calling and triaging variants from NGS data using genotype-likelihood confidence rather than raw allele counts, interpreting a BLAST/DIAMOND homology search…

wonsukchoi/domain-experts · 168 tokens

shipjaw-prompt

Turns a rough, messy, or vague product idea into a dense build-ready product prompt and persists it at documentation/product/source-prompt.md for shipjaw-build. Use when the user wants to express/clarify/polish a product before scaffolding, mentions idée vague, brainstorm app, help me write the prompt, notes produit…

XyDisorder/shipjaw · 147 tokens

9router

Entry point for 9Router — local/remote AI gateway with OpenAI-compatible REST for chat, image, TTS, embeddings, web search, web fetch. Use when the user mentions 9Router, NINEROUTERURL, or wants AI without writing provider boilerplate. This skill covers setup + indexes capability skills; fetch the relevant capability…

decolua/9router · 84 tokens

dashscope

DashScope (Alibaba Cloud Bailian / 阿里云百炼) integration — image generation (qwen-image-2.0-pro), text-to-speech (qwen3-tts-flash), and ASR with word-level timestamps (qwen3-asr-flash-filetrans). Use when generating images via Qwen-Image, narrating via Qwen-TTS, or transcribing with word-level timestamps via Qwen-ASR.

calesthio/OpenMontage · 93 tokens

best-practices

Transforms vague prompts into optimized Claude Code prompts. Adds verification, specific context, constraints, and proper phasing. Invoke with /best-practices.

MoizIbnYousaf/Ai-Agent-Skills · 35 tokens

AI/ML Model Testing

Testing machine learning models including accuracy validation, bias detection, drift monitoring, A/B testing, and model regression testing.

PramodDutta/qaskills · 29 tokens