Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add domengabrovsek/claude --skill fix-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/domengabrovsek/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/domengabrovsek/claude/fix-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/domengabrovsek/claude/fix-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/domengabrovsek/claude/fix-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/domengabrovsek/claude/fix-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/domengabrovsek/claude/fix-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00528 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
fix-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 27 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 109f37a21eaa
fix-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository domengabrovsek/claude (15 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 528 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims.
fix-issue
Analyze and fix a GitHub issue end-to-end.
roam
Codebase comprehension via roam-code CLI. Use when exploring codebases, planning modifications, debugging failures, assessing PR risk, or checking architecture health. Triggers on: understanding project structure, pre-change safety checks, finding symbols/files, blast radius analysis, affected tests, health scoring…
explain-issue
Explain a GitHub issue: the background problem and the proposed solution.
ring:committing-changes
Commit changes with scope allowlist enforcement, atomic grouping, GPG-signed conventional commits, and trailer management. Detects the repo's PR-validation scope policy before proposing any message. Use when the user asks to commit or has changes ready to record. Skip when the working tree is clean or the user wants…
ring:searching-code
Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…