verification-before-completion

verification-before-completion is a skill for Claude Code from JeremyDev87/codingbuddy. It costs 38 tokens per session (1,692 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A verification procedure for checking changes before claiming they are complete, fixed, or passing. It requires running relevant commands and confirming their results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before reporting completion, committing code, creating pull requests, or closing issues.
Why use it?
It prevents unsupported success claims when tests, builds, lint checks, or diffs have not actually been reviewed.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it before reporting completion, committing code, creating pull requests, or closing issues.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/verification-before-completion
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add JeremyDev87/codingbuddy --skill verification-before-completion
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddy

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verification-before-completion

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/verification-before-completion/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/verification-before-completion)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/verification-before-completion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/verification-before-completion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verification-before-completion

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/verification-before-completion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/verification-before-completion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,692 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.01692
Opus 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00677
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00338
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00169

Measured 1mo ago against content hash e68e49eb9c9c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verification-before-completion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/rules/.ai-rules/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md · 235 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 235 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Verification Before Completion

Overview

Claiming success without evidence is guessing. "It should work" is not verification.

Core principle: ALWAYS run verification commands and confirm output before claiming work is complete. Evidence before assertions.

Violating the letter of these checks is violating the spirit of quality.

The Iron Law

NO SUCCESS CLAIMS WITHOUT RUNNING VERIFICATION COMMANDS

If you haven't seen passing output with your own eyes, you cannot claim it works.

No exceptions:

  • Don't say "tests should pass" — run them
  • Don't say "build looks fine" — build it
  • Don't say "no lint errors" — lint it
  • Don't say "changes look good" — diff them

When to Use

Always, before:

  • Claiming work is "done" or "complete"
  • Committing code
  • Creating pull requests
  • Closing issues
  • Reporting success to teammates
  • Moving to the next task

Use this ESPECIALLY when:

  • Under time pressure (rushing guarantees missed issues)
  • Changes seem trivial ("just a typo" can break builds)
  • You've made multiple changes across files
  • Refactoring existing code
  • Fixing bugs (verify the fix AND no regressions)

Don't skip when:

  • Change seems too small to break anything (small changes break things)
  • You're confident it works (confidence ≠ evidence)
  • You "already tested manually" (manual ≠ systematic)
  • CI will catch it (catch it NOW, not after push)

The Four Phases

You MUST complete all four phases before claiming completion. Order matters.

Phase 1: Test Execution

Run ALL relevant tests, not just the ones you think matter.

# Run tests for affected area
npm test -- --coverage path/to/affected/
# OR
yarn test path/to/affected/

# Run full test suite if changes are cross-cutting
npm test

Verify:

  • All tests pass (zero failures)
  • No test warnings or errors in output
  • Coverage hasn't decreased
  • New code has corresponding tests
  • No skipped tests you forgot to unskip

Test fails? Fix it. Do NOT proceed to Phase 2.

Read the full file on GitHub · 235 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 235 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A e68e49eb9c9c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verification-before-completion is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,692 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories