Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add smartwhale8/claude-playbook --skill fix-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smartwhale8/claude-playbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/smartwhale8/claude-playbook/fix-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smartwhale8/claude-playbook/fix-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smartwhale8/claude-playbook/fix-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smartwhale8/claude-playbook/fix-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smartwhale8/claude-playbook/fix-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00219 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00110 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
fix-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Analyze and fix the GitHub issue: $ARGUMENTS
Follow this workflow:
- Understand: Run
gh issue view $ARGUMENTSto get issue details - Investigate: Search the codebase for relevant files and understand the root cause
- Plan: Describe your approach before making changes
- Implement: Make the necessary code changes
- Test: Write a test that would have caught this issue, then run the test suite
- Verify: Ensure lint and type checks pass
- Commit: Create a descriptive commit message referencing the issue
- PR: Push and create a PR with
gh pr create
Important:
- Address the ROOT CAUSE, not just the symptom
- If the fix requires changes across multiple files, explain why
- If the issue is unclear, ask for clarification before implementing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 24 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 901bf053ce6e
fix-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository smartwhale8/claude-playbook (37 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 219 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:committing-changes
Commit changes with scope allowlist enforcement, atomic grouping, GPG-signed conventional commits, and trailer management. Detects the repo's PR-validation scope policy before proposing any message. Use when the user asks to commit or has changes ready to record. Skip when the working tree is clean or the user wants…
ring:searching-code
Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…
ring:opening-pull-requests
Open a GitHub Pull Request with automatic base branch detection, scope allowlist enforcement, PR template filling, and post-create base verification. Replaces ring:generating-pr-descriptions. Use after pushing a branch when ready to open a PR. Skip if the branch is not yet pushed or there are uncommitted changes …
ring:shipping-changes
End-to-end git orchestrator: branch → commit → push → PR, with a full plan presented before any execution. Detects base branch and scope allowlist once and propagates to all phases. Use when ready to ship a complete unit of work. Skip if only one phase is needed: commit-only → ring:committing-changes, PR-only →…
ring:generating-pr-descriptions
Generating pull request descriptions from git branch changes with automatic title generation, change-type detection, and smart analysis. Uses branch-only scope to avoid full history analysis. Use when preparing a PR for review. Skip when the PR is a single trivial commit or description already exists.
ring:generating-release-guides
Generating an internal Operations-facing update/migration guide from the git diff between two refs, documenting per-change client impact, deploy ordering, monitoring, and rollback notes in English, pt-br, or both. Use when preparing a version release or recording what changed for the Ops team. Runs read-only by…