meddpicc-qualification

meddpicc-qualification is a skill for Claude Code from Doris-Labs/sales-skills. It costs 68 tokens per session (1,713 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A MEDDPICC deal-qualification scorecard. MEDDPICC is a sales framework for checking business impact, decision-makers, buying requirements, and other evidence that a deal is real.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to score the deal, identify qualification gaps, and turn each gap into a specific next action.
Why use it?
It separates facts from assumptions and shows exactly which missing information or relationships put the deal at risk.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the sales-skills plugin — 30 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to score the deal, identify qualification gaps, and turn each gap into a specific next action.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/meddpicc-qualification
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Doris-Labs/sales-skills --skill meddpicc-qualification
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Doris-Labs/sales-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install sales-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 30 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for meddpicc-qualification

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/meddpicc-qualification/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/meddpicc-qualification)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/meddpicc-qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/meddpicc-qualification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for meddpicc-qualification

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/meddpicc-qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/meddpicc-qualification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 68 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,713 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00068 $0.01713
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.00856
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00343
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00171

Measured 11d ago against content hash 9e648f900e2d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

meddpicc-qualification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/meddpicc-qualification/SKILL.md · 134 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

MEDDPICC Qualification

Purpose

Pressure-test a deal against MEDDPICC, mark each element as evidence-backed or assumed, and convert every gap into a named next action. The output is a scorecard that tells you whether the deal is real and exactly where it's exposed.

Inputs

  • The deal: account, value, stage, expected close date
  • What you know per element (notes, transcripts, CRM fields, or recollection)
  • Who's involved and their role/influence

Method

Score each of the eight elements 0–2 and tag the source as evidence (something the buyer said or did) or assumption (your inference). An element only scores 2 if it's evidence-backed.

Scoring scale (per element):

  • 0 — unknown / blank
  • 1 — assumed, weak, or inferred (no buyer confirmation)
  • 2 — confirmed by buyer evidence (quote, document, or action)

The eight elements — what "2" looks like and the gap-closing action:

  1. Metrics — quantified business impact the buyer will get. 2 = a number the buyer owns ("cut ramp time 30%", "$400K savings"). Gap action: ask "how will you measure success in 12 months?" and get a number on the record.
  2. Economic buyer — the person who can release budget. 2 = you've met them and they've engaged on value. Gap action: "who signs the PO, and what do they need to see?" then secure direct access.
  3. Decision criteria — the buyer's must-have requirements. 2 = a written/stated list you've influenced. Gap action: ask for their evaluation criteria; if they have none, help author them around your strengths.
  4. Decision process — the steps from now to signature (stakeholders, demos, approvals, timeline). 2 = a documented sequence with dates. Gap action: map the process step by step and confirm it back.
  5. Paper process — procurement, legal, security, signature mechanics. 2 = you know the steps and lead time (MSA, infosec review, redlines). Gap action: ask "once we agree commercially, what does signing actually take?" early, not at close.
  6. Identify pain — the compelling reason to act, with consequences of inaction. 2 = explicit pain tied to a cost/deadline the buyer voiced. Gap action: quantify the cost of doing nothing and the trigger event.
  7. Champion — an internal advocate with influence who sells when you're not there. 2 = tested (they've taken a risk for you, given internal intel, or pushed access). Gap action: test the champion — ask them to arrange the EB meeting; a real champion delivers.
  8. Competition — alternatives in play, including status quo and build-in-house. 2 = you know the alternatives and your differentiated position. Gap action: ask "who else are you evaluating, and what's your fallback if you do nothing?"

Read the full file on GitHub · 134 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 134 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 9e648f900e2d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

meddpicc-qualification is a skill published in the GitHub repository Doris-Labs/sales-skills (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,713 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.