Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Doris-Labs/sales-skills --skill mutual-action-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Doris-Labs/sales-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/mutual-action-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/mutual-action-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/mutual-action-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/mutual-action-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doris-labs/sales-skills/mutual-action-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01697 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00679 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00339 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00170 |
Grade A, and why
mutual-action-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mutual Action Plan
Purpose
Turn a target go-live date into a shared, dated plan the buyer co-owns — so the path to close is explicit, every step has a named owner on both sides, and the hidden gates (decision, procurement, legal, security) surface before they slip the date.
Inputs
- The buyer's target go-live / "value by" date (the only date that matters — work back from it)
- Stakeholders on both sides and their roles (champion, EB, procurement, legal, security, IT)
- The deal's current stage and what's already committed
- Known process requirements (security review, MSA/redlines, vendor onboarding, budget approval)
Method
- Anchor on the go-live date, not the close date. Ask the buyer: "When do you need this delivering value?" Close date is derived, not chosen.
- Backward-plan the milestones. From go-live, subtract each step's lead time to place it
on the calendar. Don't forward-plan from today — that hides the slack you don't have.
Typical chain (work right-to-left):
- Go-live / onboarding kickoff
- Contract signed
- Procurement / PO issued
- Legal redlines + MSA executed
- Security / InfoSec review passed
- Verbal commit / decision made
- Business case approved by EB
- Technical validation / POC complete
- Assign an owner on BOTH sides for every milestone. A milestone with only a seller owner is a wish; one with only a buyer owner is a hope. Each row names a seller owner and a buyer owner. Buyer-only steps (procurement, legal, security) still get a seller owner who chases.
- Surface the non-sales gates explicitly. Decision, procurement, legal, and security
are where deals die silently. Each gets its own row with realistic lead time:
- Decision: who signs off, what they need to see, by when
- Procurement: vendor onboarding, PO process, payment terms, portal setup
- Legal: MSA/DPA, redline rounds (assume ≥2), who in legal owns it
- Security: InfoSec questionnaire, SOC2/pen-test review, SSO/data requirements
- Make it a shared document, not a slide. The MAP lives where the buyer can see and edit it (shared doc / deal room). Use the table format below.
- Get the buyer to co-own it. Co-ownership is earned, not asked for:
- Build the first draft with the champion live on a call, not for them in advance.
- Ask them to fill in the buyer-side owners and dates — their handwriting on it is the commit.
- Frame it as protecting their go-live date: "If we miss security by the 14th, your March launch slips — let's make sure that doesn't happen."
- Send it after every call with the status column updated; it becomes the shared truth.
- A champion who won't engage with the MAP is telling you the deal isn't real.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 653b9e92c290
mutual-action-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository Doris-Labs/sales-skills (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,697 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
mutual-action-plan compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mutual-action-planDoris-Labs/sales-skills | Skill | 3 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 75 | Claude Code |
| lynquGravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit | Skill | 6 | 11d ago | none | A | 40 | Claude Code, Codex |
| lynqu-sales-followupGravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit | Skill | 6 | 11d ago | none | A | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| lynqu-deal-deskGravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit | Skill | 6 | 11d ago | none | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| lynqu-event-blitzGravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit | Skill | 6 | 11d ago | none | A | 47 | Claude Code, Codex |
| lynqu-lead-managementGravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit | Skill | 6 | 11d ago | none | A | 40 | Claude Code, Codex |
| lynqu-outreachGravisun/lynqu-ai-toolkit | Skill | 6 | 11d ago | none | A | 41 | Claude Code, Codex |