Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DropFan/claude-code-plugins --skill lark-contactgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DropFan/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dropfan/claude-code-plugins/lark-contact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dropfan/claude-code-plugins/lark-contact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dropfan/claude-code-plugins/lark-contact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dropfan/claude-code-plugins/lark-contact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dropfan/claude-code-plugins/lark-contact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.01315 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00526 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
lark-contact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to lark-contact — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚙️ Cowork / Claude Desktop 执行环境说明（自动注入）
本技能依赖本地
lark-cli（@larksuite/cli，可用command -v lark-cli定位）及其~/.lark-cli登录态（应用密钥存于 macOS keychain）。在 Cowork 中运行任何
lark-cli命令时，必须在本地 macOS 上执行（使用 Desktop Commander 的start_process/interact_with_process，或其它本地 shell 工具），不要用隔离的 Linux 沙箱mcp__workspace__bash——沙箱里没有 lark-cli、也读不到 keychain。 执行前确保 npm 全局 bin 目录（npm prefix -g输出目录下的bin）在 PATH 中。（在 Claude Code 中可忽略本说明，lark-cli 在本机 shell 直接可用。）
选哪个命令
user 身份和 bot 身份是两条完全独立的路径。先确定当前身份,再按下表选命令:
| 想做什么 | user 身份 | bot 身份 |
|---|---|---|
| 按姓名 / 邮箱搜员工拿 open_id | +search-user |
不支持 |
| 按关键词搜索当前用户可见的机器人 / 智能体 | +search-bot |
不支持 |
| 已知 open_id 取他人资料 | +search-user --user-ids <id> |
+get-user --user-id <id> |
| 查看自己 | +get-user 或 +search-user --user-ids me |
不支持 |
| 查同事的个人状态 / 签名 | user_profiles batch_query |
不支持 |
已知 open_id 只是想发消息 / 排日程,不必经过 contact —— 直接 lark-im / lark-calendar。
名字没说清是人还是机器人 / 智能体
用户给的名字常常不表明类型。例如「和 reviewDuck 约个会」里的 reviewDuck 可能是同事昵称,也可能是机器人。
- 名字含 bot / agent / AI / 助手 / 机器人 / 智能体 / assistant 等明显特征时,反过来先搜机器人更快
- 不确定的话两边都搜一下
典型场景
找张三给他发消息:先搜,确认 open_id,再发:
lark-cli contact +search-user --query "张三" --has-chatted --as user
lark-cli im +messages-send --user-id ou_xxx --text "Hi!"
批量查同事的个人状态 / 个性签名(先用 schema 看参数)。
lark-cli schema contact.user_profiles.batch_query
lark-cli contact user_profiles batch_query \
--params '{"user_id_type":"open_id"}' \
--data '{"user_ids":["ou_xxx","ou_yyy"],"query_option":{"include_personal_status":true,"include_description":true}}' \
--as user
搜索命中多条且后续操作有副作用(发消息、邀请会议等),把候选列给用户挑;不要擅自选第一条。
搜索机器人 / 智能体
+search-bot 使用 user 身份按关键词搜索当前用户可见的机器人,返回 ou_ 开头的机器人 open_id。参数细节等见 lark-contact-search-bot.md。
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 83 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 61860533af81
lark-contact is a skill published in the GitHub repository DropFan/claude-code-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,315 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to lark-contact, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
session-relay
Continue real repository work between Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Grok Build with a privacy-bounded, drift-aware handoff packet. Use for cross-vendor takeover, context-limit checkpoints, multi-hop Claude→Codex→Grok relays, or receiving an existing Director packet. Use native resume commands for same-CLI history; never…
import-audio
Moves audio files to the correct album location with proper path structure. Use when the user has downloaded WAV files from Suno or other sources that need to be organized.
fly
Fly one thought to its destination across concurrent agents, on whatever the project and harness already have. Lands only when the user has accounted for every detail, never on an agent's say-so.
deepen
Hold an ask to the bar a top professional in its field would set — a deeper ask, never a bigger one. Use when an ask is clear but nothing yet names the sources, methods, target, or outside check the work will meet.
consult
Bring how named experts would think about the question. Use when the user wants expert thinking on a tradeoff, choice, or stuck problem — not a verdict.
setup
Use when installing or refreshing sound taste rules in a project — an explicit "sound setup", starting work in a repo with no .claude/sound/, or a taste-not-defined nudge. Also use to re-run after a stack change (new framework, new package in a monorepo).