Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add drpedapati/sciclaw --skill humanize-textgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drpedapati/sciclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drpedapati/sciclaw/humanize-text)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drpedapati/sciclaw/humanize-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drpedapati/sciclaw/humanize-text/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drpedapati/sciclaw/humanize-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drpedapati/sciclaw/humanize-text.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00081 | $0.01044 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00418 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
humanize-text scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A 6f4ff089d155
humanize-text is a skill published in the GitHub repository drpedapati/sciclaw (90 stars, last pushed 17d ago), with no licence file. It adds 81 tokens to every session and 1,044 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
crawlkit
Maintain and release the crawlkit Go library, preserving downstream compatibility for gitcrawl, slacrawl, discrawl, and notcrawl.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover language-specific syntax — delegates to specialized skills.
go-concurrency
Use when writing concurrent Go code — goroutines, channels, mutexes, or thread-safety guarantees. Also use when parallelizing work, fixing data races, or protecting shared state, even if the user doesn't explicitly mention concurrency primitives. Does not cover context.Context patterns (see go-context).
go-control-flow
Use when writing conditionals, loops, or switch statements in Go — including if with initialization, early returns, for loop forms, range, switch, type switches, and blank identifier patterns. Also use when writing a simple if/else or for loop, even if the user doesn't mention guard clauses or variable scoping. Does…
go-defensive
Use when hardening Go code at API boundaries — copying slices/maps, verifying interface compliance, using defer for cleanup, time.Time/time.Duration, or avoiding mutable globals. Also use when reviewing for robustness concerns like missing cleanup or unsafe crypto usage, even if the user doesn't mention "defensive…
go-documentation
Use when writing or reviewing documentation for Go packages, types, functions, or methods. Also use proactively when creating new exported types, functions, or packages, even if the user doesn't explicitly ask about documentation. Does not cover code comments for non-exported symbols (see go-style-core).