Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dryvist/claude-code-plugins --skill track-followupsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dryvist/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/track-followups)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/track-followups"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/track-followups/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/track-followups"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dryvist/claude-code-plugins/track-followups.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.02034 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00814 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
track-followups scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
# zammad_api <api path> [curl args] How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Track Follow-Ups
Given follow-up items that have already been triaged, put each one where it will be seen again. A listed follow-up is not a tracked follow-up. This skill creates the item and reports back what it created.
It owns the routing and the creation mechanics. Callers own the triage.
Routing
| Kind of item | Destination | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Work to be done — defects, features, chores, tech debt, side quests | Your issue tracker (Vikunja) | It is a task; it belongs on the board with everything else |
| Incidents — outages, anomalies, RCA-worthy events, security findings, weaknesses | The incident system of record (Zammad) | Incidents need a lifecycle, an audit trail, and a place that is not public |
| Small enough to finish next session (roughly 1–3 tasks) | The next-session prompt | Tracking it would be overhead; it is about to be done |
GitHub issues are never created
Public GitHub carries pull requests only. Never open a GitHub issue, and never put an incident narrative, security finding, credential detail, internal hostname, topology, or outage timeline in any GitHub issue, PR body, comment, or commit message. "It is only a side quest" is not an exemption — that reasoning is exactly how operational detail reaches a public repository.
An item that is both an incident and a code fix gets split: an incident ticket and a tracker task, each carrying the other's URL in its description. Cross-linking is a plain URL each way; there is no integration to configure.
Procedure
1. Confirm the tooling is there
Check for mcp__vikunja__* and mcp__zammad__* before anything else. Zammad is
attached only where its work happens, so in most repositories reach it over REST
instead. It reads ZAMMAD_URL (already ending in /api/v1) and
ZAMMAD_HTTP_TOKEN from the environment, for example a .env file loaded into
the shell. Never print the token:
# zammad_api <api path> [curl args]
zammad_api() { p=$1; shift; curl -sS \
-H "Authorization: Token token=$ZAMMAD_HTTP_TOKEN" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
"$ZAMMAD_URL$p" "$@"; }
zammad_api /tickets/search -G --data-urlencode limit=5 --data-urlencode expand=false \
--data-urlencode 'query=state.name:(new OR open) AND title:"<phrase>"' # search
zammad_api /tickets -X POST -d '<the step 4b ticket as JSON>' # create
zammad_api /tickets/<id> -X PUT -d '<fields>' # update / close
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +2 lines 7f3267f271a4
- 10d ago Changed · +4 lines fd88005ed62d
- 16d ago Changed 8d63b1135f7a
- 17d ago Changed 7f99c3e6d7e9
- 21d ago Changed · +15 lines 73723448cefb
- 27d ago Changed · -25 tokens per session ff3f19e551fe
- 1mo ago Changed · +51 lines b259d8be4ef9
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A dc35b0950fbb
track-followups is a skill published in the GitHub repository dryvist/claude-code-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 2,034 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
project
A single starting point for setting up an AI-assisted project in Claude Cowork. It asks questions about the work, reviews available add-ons, and creates project instructions, custom agents, and connected workflows.
cs-escalation
A customer-support escalation manager for complaints, VIP cases, customer feedback, and recurring service problems. It assigns escalation levels, analyses the voice of the customer, and creates weekly support summaries.
hr-operations
A skill for designing remote-work and team-operation policies. It covers flexible work, asynchronous communication, collaboration tools, productivity tracking, and employee experience.
hr-performance-review
A skill for designing and running employee performance reviews. It covers MBO, OKRs, KPIs, 360-degree feedback, review guides, and feedback conversations; OKRs set goals and measurable results, while KPIs track ongoing performance.
collab-process
A process-documentation assistant for Korean workplaces. It helps write operating manuals, SOPs, purchasing documents, meeting notes, and action plans; an SOP is a repeatable step-by-step work procedure.
collab-status-report
A reporting skill that turns supplied metrics or existing files into KPI dashboards and weekly, monthly, or quarterly status reports. KPIs are measurable indicators of progress toward a goal; OKRs pair goals with measurable results.