CyberStrikeAI is a security operations workspace that turns natural-language plans into governed, auditable actions while recording evidence and results for later reuse. Authorized security teams use it to manage agents, tools, vulnerabilities, knowledge, and attack-chain analysis. Catalogue add-ons provide agent and skill workflows for working with the platform.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI --skill active-directory-attackgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ed1s0nz/cyberstrikeai/active-directory-attack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ed1s0nz/cyberstrikeai/active-directory-attack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ed1s0nz/cyberstrikeai/active-directory-attack.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high YARA Match · line 4 YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.00560 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
active-directory-attack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
内网域攻击
=== 内网域(2023+真实主战场) ===
侦察: BloodHound(SharpHound收集→攻击路径) | Kerberos: GetNPUsers(AS-REP)/GetUserSPNs(Kerberoast)
🚨ADCS(Certipy一把梭): certipy find -vulnerable | ESC1指定SAN申域管证书 | ESC8 relay到CA拿DC证书
🚨NTLM Relay(比PtH重要,PtH常被EDR拦): ntlmrelayx -t ldap--escalate-user / -t http CA --adcs(ESC8) / RBCD
🚨强制认证Coerce: PetitPotam(MS-EFSRPC)/coercer全协议喷/printerbug → 喂给relay
🚨DACL滥用: WriteDACL→给自己加DCSync | 影子凭据certipy shadow(GenericWrite即可,不改密码不留痕)
DCSync: secretsdump -just-dc → krbtgt hash→Golden Ticket
🚨一击致命域CVE(先测,命中直接域管): Zerologon(CVE-2020-1472,置空DC机器账户密码→DCSync) | NoPac(CVE-2021-42278/42287,机器账户改名申DC TGT) | PrintNightmare(CVE-2021-34527,后台打印RCE/加载恶意驱动) | EternalBlue(MS17-010,老SMBv1直RCE)
🚨IPv6/mitm6(默认双栈内网必打): mitm6劫持DHCPv6+DNS→WPAD→ntlmrelayx到LDAP/ADCS(比LLMNR更隐蔽,现代内网首选)
LLMNR/NBT-NS投毒: responder抓NetNTLMv2→hashcat破/relay
Linux内网: Redis未授权(CONFIG SET dir写SSH key) | NFS showmount | Docker 2375
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 24 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 8f08520d82a6
active-directory-attack is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ed1s0nZ/CyberStrikeAI (6,410 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 560 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fix-security-vulnerabilities-with-strix
Fix security vulnerabilities found by a Strix pentest (open-source CLI or app.strix.ai cloud) — triage by severity, patch the root cause rather than the symptom, and re-run Strix to prove each fix actually closes the exploit. Handles injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control, IDOR, and other validated findings. Use…
find-security-vulnerabilities-in-code
Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy…
managed-pentesting-with-strix
Run a managed pentest of a web app, API, repository, or local workspace on the app.strix.ai platform with the strix cloud CLI or REST API — no local Docker or LLM key needed. Safely review and upload local source, register assets, launch and poll scans, triage vulnerabilities, export SARIF, download compliance…
ci-security-scanning-with-strix
Add security scanning to CI/CD with Strix — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or any pipeline — so every pull request gets a diff-scoped AI pentest that blocks vulnerable code before it merges, with results as PR comments and SARIF uploaded to code scanning. Covers both the self-hosted open-source CLI (runs in your runner)…
svc-mobile-android
Android APK static analysis — OWASP Mobile Top 10, Retrofit API audit, transport security, smali reading, component export, auth flow analysis. Use when target is an APK/Android app. Triggers - APK, Android, mobile app, decompiled, smali, jadx, apktool.
web-auth-bypass-idor
Broken access control - IDOR, privilege escalation, JWT abuse, mass assignment, forced browsing - for web apps and APIs. Use on any multi-user or role-based app with object IDs, tokens, or admin functionality. Triggers - /api/users/ , /orders/ , ?account=/uid=/doc=, JWT (eyJ...), role/isAdmin field, admin panel, "403…