Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add edheltzel/Do-Skills --skill ffi-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edheltzel/Do-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/ffi-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/ffi-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/ffi-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/ffi-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/edheltzel/do-skills/ffi-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.02416 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00966 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00483 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00242 |
Grade A, and why
ffi-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 158 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 95a7870b42f5
ffi-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository edheltzel/Do-Skills (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 2,416 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
cpp-coding-standards
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
memory-safety-patterns
Implement memory-safe programming with RAII, ownership, smart pointers, and resource management across Rust, C++, and C. Use when writing safe systems code, managing resources, or preventing memory bugs.
pixiv-cli-native
Change or validate pixiv-cli ugoira encoding, pure-Go platform builds, Linux ABI, and native runner evidence. Use when encoder behavior, target builds, or artifact provenance change; routine leaf Go changes use the develop/test workflow.
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…
writing-rust
Idiomatic Rust development. Use when writing Rust code, Cargo crates/workspaces, Rust tests, or rustfmt/clippy/cargo workflows. Emphasizes ownership, Result errors, small APIs, stdlib-first dependencies, fast cargo feedback, and behavior tests. NOT for Go, Python, TypeScript, shell scripts, or infra-only work.
architectural_review
Review Rust code for advanced architectural patterns — capability mixins, typed commands, concurrency model choice, smart pointer/interior mutability selection, error-handling architecture, and memory layout. Use when the user asks to review system architecture, suggest broad design improvements, or evaluate trait…