Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit --skill four-principlesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/four-principles)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/four-principles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/four-principles/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/four-principles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/four-principles.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.00656 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
four-principles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Four Engineering Principles
Apply these four principles to every task — interpreting a request, designing an approach, writing/editing/refactoring/fixing code, and verifying the result. They are always-on (enforced by rule R6); this is the detailed playbook for the how.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
- State assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" / "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
- Test: Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated? If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
- Remove imports / variables / functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
- Test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Reframe vague asks into verifiable ones:
| Vague ask | Verifiable reframe |
|---|---|
| "Add validation" | Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass |
| "Fix the bug" | Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass |
| "Refactor X" | Ensure tests pass before AND after |
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan with a verify check per step:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A f477f6c1f637
four-principles is a skill published in the GitHub repository endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit (9 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 656 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hydra
Multi-agent orchestration framework for Claude Code. Automatically delegates tasks to cheaper, faster sub-agents (Haiku, Sonnet) while maintaining Opus-level quality through verification. Use when working on any coding task — Hydra activates automatically to route file exploration, test running, documentation, code…
rfc
Manage architecture RFCs: create, review, list, update, and transition status. Use when user mentions "RFC", "technical proposal", "architecture proposal", or wants to draft, review, list, update, or change status of RFCs.
cleaning-up-branches
Deletes merged git branches (local and remote) and flags stale unmerged branches for manual review. Use when user mentions "cleanup branches", "delete merged branches", "prune old branches", "remove stale branches", "branch cleanup", or runs /cleanup-branches command.
prototype
Rapid UI prototyping — generates 3 visually distinct HTML/CSS components from a text prompt and serves them in a live browser gallery. Use when user runs /prototype, asks to "prototype a UI", "mock up a component", "generate HTML mockups", "create UI variations", "design exploration", "quick UI concept", or wants to…
quality-stack
Scan a project to detect configured quality and testing tools across JVM (Gradle/Maven), Android (AGP/Compose/KMP), Node.js/TypeScript, and Python ecosystems. Cross-reference against research-backed recommendations and assist with setup. Auto-detects project type(s) including monorepos with mixed ecosystems. Use when…
doc-freshness
Detect documentation drift, stale references, and cross-document inconsistencies in any project. Scans for code-doc drift (API/function changes not reflected in docs), cross-doc drift (conflicting information across documents), and stale references (broken links, deleted files, outdated versions). Use when checking…