Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add etrebels/claude-code-growth-os --skill lead-qualifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/etrebels/claude-code-growth-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/etrebels/claude-code-growth-os/lead-qualify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/etrebels/claude-code-growth-os/lead-qualify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/etrebels/claude-code-growth-os/lead-qualify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/etrebels/claude-code-growth-os/lead-qualify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/etrebels/claude-code-growth-os/lead-qualify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00255 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
lead-qualify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Lead Qualify (ICP check)
Score a lead against fit, not hype. Default criteria — edit them to your own ICP in ops/icp.md if you keep one:
- Do they have the problem you solve, today (not someday)?
- Can they buy — budget, and someone with authority?
- Is there a reason to act now?
- Do you have a way in — a warm path or a real signal?
Output: a 0–4 fit count, the single biggest gap, and a call: pursue / nurture / pass. A clear "pass" is worth more than a hopeful "maybe". Read ops/icp.md first if it exists; don't invent facts about the company you weren't given.
Depth
- quick: pursue / nurture / pass + one reason.
- standard: the full scoring above.
- deep: + the disqualifiers, and what would have to change to requalify.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 576981b31a2e
lead-qualify is a skill published in the GitHub repository etrebels/claude-code-growth-os (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 255 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
startup-launch-playbook
A step-by-step playbook for early-stage startups going from pre-seed to their first 1000 users. Covers MVP validation, initial traction channels, and founder-led growth tactics. By @WeiYipei — follow on X for more startup growth insights.
a-b-testing
Design statistically sound GTM experiments for copy, channels, landing pages, sequencing, pricing, and funnel conversion. Produces hypothesis, sample-size logic, success metrics, test plan, analysis method, and scale/stop/kill recommendation. Use when planning A/B tests, split tests, or experiment roadmaps.
attribution
Build practical B2B attribution models across first touch, lead creation, opportunity creation, multi-touch, account-based influence, and sales-sourced revenue. Produces model comparison, UTM governance, source-of-truth rules, and channel ROI view. Use when marketing and sales disagree on source or ROI.
campaign-analytics
Analyze campaign performance from deliverability through revenue: delivery, engagement, replies, meetings, SQOs, pipeline, CAC, and payback. Produces diagnostic scorecard, root-cause analysis, benchmark comparison, and next-action plan. Use when deciding whether to scale, fix, or kill campaigns.
deliverability-monitoring
Monitor outbound deliverability health across domains, inboxes, DNS, bounces, spam placement, reply rates, and reputation signals. Produces alert thresholds, dashboard spec, weekly QA checklist, and remediation playbook. Use when inboxing drops, bounce rates rise, campaigns underperform, or new infrastructure launches.
gtm-metrics
Build a GTM metrics system for SaaS: funnel conversion, pipeline velocity, win rates, CAC, payback, NRR, sales efficiency, growth accounting, and executive dashboards. Use when creating metrics dashboards, board reports, revenue reviews, operating cadence, or diagnosing growth constraints.