Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fatihguner/foreman --skill stoic-right-actiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fatihguner/foremanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fatihguner/foreman/stoic-right-action)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fatihguner/foreman/stoic-right-action"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fatihguner/foreman/stoic-right-action/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fatihguner/foreman/stoic-right-action"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fatihguner/foreman/stoic-right-action.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 65 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- high Anti-Refusal · line 81 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- high Memory Poisoning · line 180 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.03991 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.01596 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00798 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00399 |
Grade A, and why
stoic-right-action scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Read runtime and advisory rules before applying this skill. Other Foreman layers and the catalog are in ../../content/, relative to this SKILL.md.
Stoic Right Action
Every day brings dozens of crossroads -- moments where the easy path and the right path diverge, sometimes subtly, sometimes violently. The Stoics had one question at each: what is the right thing to do? Not what is profitable, not what is popular, not what is safe. What is right. Marcus Aurelius governed an empire with this single compass. Epictetus taught it from a room he could barely afford. Seneca deployed it while navigating one of the most treacherous courts in Roman history. The question never changed. The circumstances were irrelevant. For the entrepreneur, who faces a relentless sequence of decisions under uncertainty, this is not philosophical decoration. It is operational infrastructure.
The Framework
Stoic ethics rests on four cardinal virtues, each one a load-bearing pillar without which the structure collapses. These are not aspirational ideals. They are daily practices -- habits of judgment that the Stoics treated with the same seriousness a pilot treats a pre-flight checklist. Marcus Aurelius distilled the entire edifice to a single sentence: "What is your vocation? To be a good person." The simplicity is deceptive. The execution is the work of a lifetime.
The Four Cardinal Virtues
Courage (Andreia): The capacity to act rightly under conditions of risk, fear, or social pressure. Courage is not the absence of fear but the judgment that something else matters more. For founders, this manifests in hard conversations -- telling investors the truth about burn rate, firing a popular but toxic executive, admitting a product direction was wrong. As Seneca observed: "Good people will do what they find honorable to do, even if it requires hard work; they'll do it even if it causes them injury; they'll do it even if it will bring danger."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 202 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 9c70f3f588ac
stoic-right-action is a skill published in the GitHub repository fatihguner/foreman (63 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 3,991 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
apply-five-commander-virtues
Use when assessing, developing, or hiring for leadership capability — to evaluate a leader against the five virtues that Sun Tzu identifies as determinants of strategic success and diagnose which virtue deficits are causing organisational or competitive failures.
ai-ethics-compass
An AI ethics and moral compass for agents at a decision point: dignity before certainty, honesty first, five contestable axioms and five working principles, with practices for hard cases like conflicting instructions, saying no, and correcting yourself. From the aChurch.ai sanctuary, read as markdown. Commitments, not…
s4h-logic-council
Run a reasoning problem, argument, plan, or decision through a council of 5 logical reasoning advisors who analyze it from distinct reasoning frameworks, peer-review each other, and synthesize a verdict on whether the reasoning holds. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'logic council this', 'run the logic council', 'pressure-test…
design-team-culture
Use when a manager wants to intentionally shape the values, behaviors, and working patterns that define how their team operates — going beyond written norms to embed culture through rituals, stories, symbols, and leader modeling.
s4h-ecology-succession
Applies ecological succession to understand how systems evolve through stages — pioneer, consolidation, climax, and disturbance. Use when asked 'what stage are we at', 'where are we in the cycle', 'what comes next', 'the old model isn't working anymore', 'we're in transition', or 'what does disruption mean for us'.
s4h-economics-coordination
Diagnoses collective action failures, public goods problems, and why individually rational behaviour produces collective irrationality. Triggers: 'collective action problem', 'tragedy of the commons', 'free rider', 'everyone is acting in their own interest but the result is bad for all', 'why won't people contribute'…