replication-package

replication-package is a skill for Claude Code from flonat/flonat-research. It costs 52 tokens per session (2,383 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A tool for preparing research code and permitted data for sharing or publication. It can assemble a clean copy, remove identifying information for anonymous review, or check whether a package can be reproduced.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare files for a journal, Zenodo, Dataverse, ICPSR, GitHub, or double-blind review, or to audit an existing replication package.
Why use it?
It reduces the manual work and omissions involved in publishing supplementary files or sharing a project. It also provides a reproducibility check before deposit.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; $skill-name invocation.

Good fit Use it to prepare files for a journal, Zenodo, Dataverse, ICPSR, GitHub, or double-blind review, or to audit an existing replication package.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/flonat/flonat-research/replication-package
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add flonat/flonat-research --skill replication-package
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for replication-package

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/replication-package/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/replication-package)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/replication-package"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/replication-package/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for replication-package

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/replication-package"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/replication-package.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,383 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Rogue Agent · line 151
    Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.
    Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.02383
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.01192
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00477
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00238

Measured 8d ago against content hash 1d6ddc365310, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

replication-package scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/replication-package/SKILL.md · 166 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Replication Package — Assemble, Anonymize, and Audit

Build publication-ready replication packages, optionally anonymize for double-blind review, or audit an existing package for reproducibility. The original project is never modified.

Modes

Mode What it does Use case
Assemble Clean copy + AI trace removal + AEA-style README Sharing, Zenodo deposit, journal supplementary
Blind Everything in Assemble + identity anonymization Double-blind conference/journal submission
Audit Read-only 11-check reproducibility validation Pre-deposit quality gate, self-check

Default mode: Assemble. Infer Blind if the user says "anonymize", "double-blind", or "blind review". Infer Audit if the user says "audit", "check reproducibility", or "validate package".

When to Use

  • Submitting supplementary materials or replication files to a journal
  • Depositing a package on Zenodo, Dataverse, or ICPSR
  • Sharing a project repo publicly (GitHub, institutional repository)
  • Preparing for double-blind submission (Blind mode)
  • Self-checking reproducibility before deposit (Audit mode)

When NOT to Use

  • Quick one-off cleanup of a single file — do it manually
  • Removing a single AI artifact — just delete it directly
  • Projects with no empirical or computational component

Critical Rules

  1. Never modify the original project. All work happens on a copy in a sibling folder.
  2. Dry-run mandatory. Always show what will be removed/changed and get user confirmation before any deletions.
  3. Binary files are never modified. Warn the user to manually check PDFs (Document Properties), images (EXIF data), and datasets for embedded metadata.
  4. Self-citations are always interactive. Never auto-remove or auto-anonymize a citation. Flag each potential self-citation and let the user decide per citation. In Blind mode, surface every self-citation against the loaded submission author list and require a per-citation decision (third-person OK / blind the entry). When the cited paper's author list is a subset of the submission's, third-person is structurally insufficient and the bib entry MUST be blinded — see _shared/double-blind-anonymity-checklist.md §P4–P5.
  5. Resolve symlinks. Use rsync -aL so symlinked content (e.g., Overleaf paper/ symlinks) becomes real files in the copy.
  6. Preserve compilability. The output must still compile/run — only infrastructure and identity are removed, not project functionality.
  7. Blind mode runs the structured-metadata field check (A2) before reporting clean. pyproject.toml [project] authors, package.json author/contributors, Cargo.toml [package] authors, CITATION.cff, LICENSE holder, etc. — see _shared/double-blind-anonymity-checklist.md §"Structured-metadata field check (A2)" for the full target list. This was the CCS 2026 #1328 desk-reject trigger and is now non-skippable.

Read the full file on GitHub · 166 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 166 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 1d6ddc365310

Subscribe to this mod's changes

replication-package is a skill published in the GitHub repository flonat/flonat-research (133 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 2,383 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

latex-compile

Compile a LaTeX document and fix every error plus aesthetic issue (overfull/underfull boxes, widows, alignment, fonts) for a clean PDF and log. Use this instead of running pdflatex/latexmk manually — it avoids the latexmk stale-log trap and silent grep failures on binary log output, and it reformats rather than…

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 79 tokens

nb-to-wolfbook

Convert Mathematica .nb or .m files to Wolfbook .wb format so they open and run in VS Code. Use when bringing existing .nb/.m files into Wolfbook, or to make an existing .wb bridge-safe.

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 53 tokens

sync-wb-nb

Propagate a change made in a Wolfbook .wb notebook into the paired .nb notebook so the two stay identical. Use immediately after every .wb edit.

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 38 tokens

wolfram-headless

Run heavy Wolfram Language (wolframscript) computations from Claude Code reliably, and diagnose the misleading "The product exited because of a license error". Use whenever invoking wolframscript on a non-trivial computation, when a wolframscript job dies with a "license error" despite a valid license, or when Wolfram…

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 84 tokens

cross-validate

Format a result, derivation, or numerical value for independent verification by a second model. Use when you want a cross-check on an important or contested result.

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 36 tokens

verify-citation

Confirm a paper actually exists (arXiv / Semantic Scholar / OpenAlex) before citing it. Use before writing any new citation.

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 31 tokens