Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add forefy/.context --skill auditor-quizgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forefy/.contextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00866 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00433 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
auditor-quiz scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auditor Quiz Skill
Generate focused, security-oriented quizzes to test auditor understanding of codebases, protocols, and documentation.
Overview
This skill creates 8-10 question quizzes that focus on:
- Protocol/system understanding and core mechanisms
- Weakness points and potential vulnerabilities
- Security considerations and attack vectors
- Core functionality and critical code paths
Questions are generated from repository documentation (README, docs/, whitepapers, specifications, inline comments) and presented interactively with immediate feedback.
Workflow
-
Identify documentation sources
- Search for documentation files:
*.md,README*,docs/*,*.sol(comments),*.rs(comments), etc. - Prioritize: security docs, architecture docs, README, specification files
- Use grep/glob to find relevant files efficiently
- Search for documentation files:
-
Analyze documentation
- Read and synthesize key information about:
- Core protocol/system mechanics
- Security assumptions and trust boundaries
- Known edge cases or limitations
- Critical functions and state transitions
- Potential attack vectors or vulnerability areas
- Read and synthesize key information about:
-
Generate quiz questions
- Create 8-10 questions (mix of multiple choice, true/false)
- Follow guidelines in
references/question-types.md - Focus on security-critical aspects and deep understanding
- Balance difficulty: 2-3 easy, 4-5 medium, 2-3 hard questions
- Include specific references (line numbers, function names)
- Store questions in memory (not in files)
-
Run the quiz conversationally
- Present questions ONE AT A TIME in the conversation
- Format clearly with question number, text, and answer options
- WAIT for the user's answer in their next message
- After receiving answer, provide immediate feedback:
- ✅ CORRECT or ❌ INCORRECT
- Show correct answer if wrong
- Provide detailed explanation
- Show current score (e.g., "Score: 3/5")
- Continue to next question only after user responds
- Track score throughout
- Display final results at the end with percentage and feedback
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 109 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 00f383f67ff4
auditor-quiz is a skill published in the GitHub repository forefy/.context (144 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 866 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
eresus-manual-security-audit
Elite manual security code review skill for deep, adversarial vulnerability hunting and exploit-chain discovery. Trigger when the user asks to: "do a deep security audit", "manual code review", "find exploit chains", "hunt for logic bugs", "red-team this codebase", "do an offensive security review", "review this like…
eresus-python-audit
Deep Python-specific security audit skill with 50+ vulnerability class coverage across 7 categories. Trigger when auditing Python code: "audit this Python app", "find Python security issues", "check Flask/Django for vulnerabilities", "Python SAST review", "check for pickle vulnerabilities", "review this FastAPI code".…
eresus-pr-security-review
Security-focused pull request and diff review skill for finding newly introduced vulnerabilities, risky regressions, and missing security tests in changed code. Trigger when the user asks to: "review this PR for security", "check this diff for vulns", "do a security code review", "audit changed files", or wants…
code-reviewer
Default code-quality route for broad code review, PR review, maintainability, correctness, and regression-risk checks. Do not use as the primary route for dedicated OWASP/security audits, review-feedback handling, completion verification, AI-code cleanup, or TDD/test-first work.
deslop
Remove AI-generated code slop from a branch: unnecessary comments, redundant defensive checks, boilerplate, style drift, and type casts. Use for cleanup of AI-written code, not for broad code review, security audit, TDD, or final verification.
refactoring-patterns
Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", "technical debt", "move method", "inline variable", "decompose conditional", or "clean up this messy code". Also trigger when…