Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add forefy/.context --skill auditor-quizgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forefy/.contextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forefy/.context/auditor-quiz.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00866 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00346 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
auditor-quiz scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auditor Quiz Skill
Generate focused, security-oriented quizzes to test auditor understanding of codebases, protocols, and documentation.
Overview
This skill creates 8-10 question quizzes that focus on:
- Protocol/system understanding and core mechanisms
- Weakness points and potential vulnerabilities
- Security considerations and attack vectors
- Core functionality and critical code paths
Questions are generated from repository documentation (README, docs/, whitepapers, specifications, inline comments) and presented interactively with immediate feedback.
Workflow
-
Identify documentation sources
- Search for documentation files:
*.md,README*,docs/*,*.sol(comments),*.rs(comments), etc. - Prioritize: security docs, architecture docs, README, specification files
- Use grep/glob to find relevant files efficiently
- Search for documentation files:
-
Analyze documentation
- Read and synthesize key information about:
- Core protocol/system mechanics
- Security assumptions and trust boundaries
- Known edge cases or limitations
- Critical functions and state transitions
- Potential attack vectors or vulnerability areas
- Read and synthesize key information about:
-
Generate quiz questions
- Create 8-10 questions (mix of multiple choice, true/false)
- Follow guidelines in
references/question-types.md - Focus on security-critical aspects and deep understanding
- Balance difficulty: 2-3 easy, 4-5 medium, 2-3 hard questions
- Include specific references (line numbers, function names)
- Store questions in memory (not in files)
-
Run the quiz conversationally
- Present questions ONE AT A TIME in the conversation
- Format clearly with question number, text, and answer options
- WAIT for the user's answer in their next message
- After receiving answer, provide immediate feedback:
- ✅ CORRECT or ❌ INCORRECT
- Show correct answer if wrong
- Provide detailed explanation
- Show current score (e.g., "Score: 3/5")
- Continue to next question only after user responds
- Track score throughout
- Display final results at the end with percentage and feedback
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 00f383f67ff4
auditor-quiz is a skill published in the GitHub repository forefy/.context (153 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 866 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
eresus-manual-security-audit
Elite manual security code review skill for deep, adversarial vulnerability hunting and exploit-chain discovery. Trigger when the user asks to: "do a deep security audit", "manual code review", "find exploit chains", "hunt for logic bugs", "red-team this codebase", "do an offensive security review", "review this like…
eresus-python-audit
Deep Python-specific security audit skill with 50+ vulnerability class coverage across 7 categories. Trigger when auditing Python code: "audit this Python app", "find Python security issues", "check Flask/Django for vulnerabilities", "Python SAST review", "check for pickle vulnerabilities", "review this FastAPI code".…
eresus-pr-security-review
Security-focused pull request and diff review skill for finding newly introduced vulnerabilities, risky regressions, and missing security tests in changed code. Trigger when the user asks to: "review this PR for security", "check this diff for vulns", "do a security code review", "audit changed files", or wants…
sast-businesslogic
Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations…
godot-code-review
Use when reviewing GDScript or C# Godot code — checklist of best practices, common anti-patterns, and Godot-specific pitfalls. Triggers on "review this script", "check my code", "any issues with this", "what's wrong with this code", including a short pasted snippet.
domain
Domain-specific: SAP Commerce, OpenSearch detection, WordPress validation, enterprise search.