Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add notque/vexjoy-agent --skill domaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/domain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/domain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/domain/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/domain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/notque/vexjoy-agent/domain.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.03611 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01444 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00722 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00361 |
Grade A, and why
domain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 378 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Domain-Specific Skills
Five domains: SAP Commerce Go review, SAP Commerce compliance audit, OpenSearch SIEM detection engineering, WordPress live validation, and enterprise search. Classify the request into one domain, then follow its section.
Mode Detection
| Domain | Signal | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| SAPCC Review | sapcc review, 10-specialist review, lead review | golang-general-engineer |
| SAPCC Audit | sapcc audit, sapcc compliance, full repo audit | golang-general-engineer |
| OpenSearch Detection | SIEM, SIGMA, MITRE, detection engineering, SOC | (this session) |
| WordPress Validation | validate wordpress post, check live post, post rendering | (this session) |
| Enterprise Search | search relevance, ranking, BM25, query understanding | opensearch-elasticsearch-engineer |
SAPCC Review
10-agent domain-specialist review. Each agent masters one rule domain and scans every package. Differs from SAPCC Audit: audit segments by package (generalist), review segments by rule domain (specialist, cross-package).
Phase 1: DISCOVER
Verify sapcc project and map the repo.
head -5 go.mod && grep -c "sapcc" go.mod
find . -name "*.go" -not -path "*/vendor/*" | wc -l
find . -name "*.go" -not -path "*/vendor/*" | sed 's|/[^/]*$||' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
Check key imports: go-bits, go-api-declarations, gophercloud, gorilla/mux, database/sql.
Gate: Repo mapped. If no sapcc imports, warn but continue.
Phase 2: DISPATCH
Load references/sapcc-review-agent-dispatch-prompts.md for the 10 agent specs.
Dispatch all 10 in ONE message via Agent tool. Each agent gets: path to sapcc-code-patterns.md, assigned sections, domain-specific reference, all .go files to scan, finding output format.
Gate: All 10 dispatched in single message.
Phase 3: AGGREGATE
Run git status --short to capture modified and untracked files. Collect all
findings. Deduplicate by file:line (keep higher severity). Apply severity
boosts:
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/opensearch-detection-engineering.md 11 KB
- references/opensearch-detection-safety-patterns.md 11 KB
- references/opensearch-incident-escalation.md 9.2 KB
- references/sapcc-audit-phase-2-dispatch-agents.md 7.4 KB
- references/sapcc-review-agent-dispatch-prompts.md 12 KB
- references/search-index-management.md 15 KB
- references/search-llm-search-failure-modes.md 13 KB
- references/search-performance-optimization.md 13 KB
- references/search-query-understanding.md 12 KB
- references/search-relevance-tuning.md 12 KB
- references/search-search-quality.md 12 KB
- references/wordpress-phase-checks.md 4.7 KB
- references/wordpress-playwright-tools.md 12 KB
- references/wordpress-validation-checks.md 11 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed · -296 lines · +4 tokens per session 7dec5a7388e9
- 27d ago First seen · 378 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A a345a885e133
domain is a skill published in the GitHub repository notque/vexjoy-agent (442 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 3,611 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other skills, from other repositories
godot-code-review
Use when reviewing GDScript or C# Godot code — checklist of best practices, common anti-patterns, and Godot-specific pitfalls. Triggers on "review this script", "check my code", "any issues with this", "what's wrong with this code", including a short pasted snippet.
refactoring-patterns
Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", "technical debt", "move method", "inline variable", "decompose conditional", or "clean up this messy code". Also trigger when…
squid-architecture-review
Periodic architectural sweep — reads existing ADRs, maps modules/dependencies/layering, and reports up to 10 prioritised findings shaped as refactor proposals /squid-refactor can consume directly.
squid-implement-night
Run the full agent-team pipeline end-to-end for one feature whose Tasks Plan is already approved by /squid-plan, handing the human a validated, ready-to-squash-merge PR. Trigger after /squid-plan.
pr-review
AUTHOR SKILL (internal to microsoft/aspire-skills). Reviews pull requests into this repo for problems only — bugs, regressions, missing eval coverage, frontmatter or routing damage, plugin-manifest drift, hook safety, and other concrete issues. Drives a six-step workflow: identify the PR, ensure the branch is…
clean-code
Code quality: meaningful names, SRP, DRY, small functions, guard clauses, refactoring. Triggers: clean code, naming, code smell, SRP, DRY, long function, god class, dead code.