Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill agent-design-best-practicesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-design-best-practices)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-design-best-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-design-best-practices/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-design-best-practices"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/agent-design-best-practices.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 19 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 104 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 181 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01864 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00932 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00373 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
agent-design-best-practices scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Design Best Practices
Overview
This skill defines best practices for designing Claude Code agent files (.claude/agents/*.md). Agent files define reusable roles that can be spawned as subagents or teammates. The core principle is that agent files define capabilities, not lifecycle -- the team lead's spawn prompt controls when and how the agent runs.
Principles
1. Define Capabilities, Not Lifecycle
Agent files describe what an agent can do. The spawn prompt from the team lead controls when it runs and what to focus on.
<!-- Wrong: Hardcodes workflow phase and interaction pattern -->
# Security Planner Agent
You are a security specialist in a plan-create Agent Team.
Given a Research Brief from the team lead, identify security
considerations for the planned changes.
## Output Format
Send your sub-plan to the team lead via `SendMessage` with this structure:
...
<!-- Correct: Defines domain expertise, team lead controls usage -->
# Security Specialist Agent
You are a security specialist who identifies vulnerabilities,
evaluates threats, and recommends mitigations for code changes.
## Analysis Process
1. Read affected files
2. STRIDE analysis
3. Check input validation
...
The wrong version is coupled to one workflow ("plan-create Agent Team", "Given a Research Brief", "Send via SendMessage"). The correct version works in any context -- planning, review, ad-hoc analysis -- because the team lead's spawn prompt provides the specific instructions.
2. One Agent Per Domain, Not Per Phase
Prefer a single agent that covers a domain over multiple agents split by workflow phase. The team lead specializes the agent per phase via the spawn prompt.
| Wrong | Right |
|---|---|
security-planner + security-reviewer |
security-specialist |
test-strategist + test-coverage-agent |
test-specialist |
architecture-planner + architecture-reviewer |
architecture-specialist |
The same agent type can be spawned multiple times with different prompts for different phases. A security-specialist spawned during planning gets "evaluate this plan for security risks" while the same type spawned during review gets "review these code changes for vulnerabilities."
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 220 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A e7ecae981854
agent-design-best-practices is a skill published in the GitHub repository majiayu000/claude-skill-registry (604 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,864 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
neo-code-review
Use this skill when the user asks to review or audit source code, a PR, diff, commit, or recent changes for bugs, security, performance, tests, compatibility, or maintainability, duplicated code or logic across files, or hard-coded values. Also use it after an AI agent finishes modifying code to inspect the current…
neo-pr
Use this skill when the user asks to create, draft, review, format, or generate a Pull Request (PR) title and description, specify target or source branches for a repository, or convert git branch diffs into concise, high-impact, non-AI-slop PR content.
neo-rust
Use this skill when writing, refactoring, debugging, or auditing Rust code. Trigger for .rs files, Cargo projects, ownership/borrowing/lifetime issues, Result/Option error handling, unnecessary clone/performance work, unsafe code review, or modern Rust architecture.
go-code-review
Use when reviewing Go code for performance, concurrency safety, security vulnerabilities, or readability issues.
iso-review
Take the work sitting on this branch and make it better, then check it. Three phases, in one order.
code-simplifier
Use when code has excessive complexity, deep nesting, unused abstractions, or violates YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles and needs simplification or cleanup.