Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add forger-labs-hq/researchforge --skill researchforge-resultsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forger-labs-hq/researchforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-results)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-results"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-results/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-results"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-results.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00509 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00254 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
researchforge-results scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Read and explain results
researchforge results show <run-id> --json
The JSON contains everything you may talk about: per-experiment measured metrics, baseline deltas, constraint checks, the ranking, the Pareto frontier over direction-inferable metrics, trade-off notes, and caveats.
How to summarize honestly:
- quote only numbers present in the JSON; never estimate, extrapolate, or fill gaps from memory — if a number is not recorded, say so;
- include the losers: rejected and failed experiments, with their recorded reasons, are first-class findings;
- surface every caveat the engine attached (including the one-off-result caveat) — a single full-benchmark win is promising, not validated;
- when candidates trade off (e.g. quality vs latency), present the frontier and let the user choose; do not silently pick for them.
For a visual overview, researchforge dashboard writes a self-contained
HTML dashboard (charts of every experiment vs the baseline, the trade-off
scatter with the constraint line, the funnel, and validation spread) to
.researchforge/reports/dashboard.html — offer researchforge dashboard --open when the user wants to see the results; it is built from the same
recorded data and nothing else. For a live view while runs are in
progress, researchforge serve --open starts a local read-only monitor
(requires pip install "researchforge[serve]").
If a candidate looks like a winner, the next step is the researchforge-validate skill — repeated runs are what earn the word "validated".
Rules
- The Python engine is the boundary: never work around a validation error, a protected path, or an approval gate — fix the artifact or ask the user.
- Approvals belong to the user: never pass
--yesor type a confirmation unless the user explicitly approved that step in this conversation. - Ground every summary in stored data: quote only numbers returned by
--jsonoutput or files under.researchforge/— never invent metrics.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 48 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 69b2971a6af1
researchforge-results is a skill published in the GitHub repository forger-labs-hq/researchforge (8 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 509 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
flux-analyzer
Analyse FBA flux distributions to extract biological insights. Covers gene essentiality, phenotypic phase planes, flux sampling, pathway-level aggregation, secretion product prediction, and production of publication- quality figures.
fba-simulator
Run Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) and related constraint-based simulations using COBRApy. Covers standard FBA, parsimonious FBA (pFBA), Flux Variability Analysis (FVA), loopless FBA, gene/reaction knockouts, and carbon source swapping. Outputs flux distributions and CSV files.
gsmm-validator
Validate a COBRApy genome-scale metabolic model for mass/charge balance, stoichiometric consistency, biomass producibility, dead-end metabolites, thermodynamic loops, and GPR rule formatting. Outputs a structured validation report with errors and warnings.
gsmm-builder
Build or load a genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) using COBRApy. Covers loading from BIGG, constructing minimal models from scratch, setting medium constraints, and exporting validated .json model files.
stat-research-orchestrator
Orchestrate a statistical research pipeline centered on formal problem formulation, method proposal, theoretical analysis, experimental evaluation, comparison, and final result synthesis.
mfa-pipeline-orchestrator
Orchestrate the full metabolic flux analysis pipeline from model loading to phenotype prediction and publication figures. Triggers when the user provides an organism name, BIGG model ID, or custom reaction list and wants end-to-end metabolic modelling run automatically.