Vibe-Skills is a collection and routing system that helps AI agents discover, select, and coordinate specialized skills for completing tasks. It is intended for agents that need to organize workflows across many installed capabilities. The catalogue entries are skills and an agent belonging to this system.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills --skill literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.05021 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.02511 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01004 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00502 |
Grade A, and why
literature-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to literature-review — 207 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 579 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Literature Review
Overview
Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Search multiple literature sources, synthesize findings thematically, verify citations for accuracy, and generate professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication
- Synthesizing current knowledge on a specific topic across multiple sources
- Performing meta-analysis or scoping reviews
- Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis
- Investigating the state of the art in a research domain
- Identifying research gaps and future directions
- Requiring verified citations and professional formatting
Core Workflow
Literature reviews follow a structured, multi-phase workflow:
Phase 1: Planning and Scoping
-
Define Research Question: Use PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) for clinical/biomedical reviews
- Example: "What is the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 (I) for treating sickle cell disease (P) compared to standard care (C)?"
-
Establish Scope and Objectives:
- Define clear, specific research questions
- Determine review type (narrative, systematic, scoping, meta-analysis)
- Set boundaries (time period, geographic scope, study types)
-
Develop Search Strategy:
- Identify 2-4 main concepts from research question
- List synonyms, abbreviations, and related terms for each concept
- Plan Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to combine terms
- Select minimum 3 complementary databases
-
Set Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria:
- Date range (e.g., last 10 years: 2015-2024)
- Language (typically English, or specify multilingual)
- Publication types (peer-reviewed, preprints, reviews)
- Study designs (RCTs, observational, in vitro, etc.)
- Document all criteria clearly
Phase 2: Systematic Literature Search
- Multi-Database Search:
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 579 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A eb3eb94062bb
literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills (3,252 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 5,021 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to literature-review, differing in 207 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-scientist
Data science across machine learning, statistical modeling, and experimentation. Use when selecting ML algorithms, engineering features, designing A/B tests, evaluating model performance, or building predictive pipelines.
statistical-analyst
Applied statistics for business and product questions — test selection, assumption checks, power planning, effect sizes with intervals, multiplicity correction. Use when interpreting an experiment, sizing a study, or vetting a claim.
jupyter-live-kernel
Use a live Jupyter kernel for stateful, iterative Python execution via hamelnb. Load this skill when the task involves exploration, iteration, or inspecting intermediate results — data science, ML experimentation, API exploration, or building up complex code step-by-step. Uses terminal to run CLI commands against a…
neuroskill-bci
Connect to a running NeuroSkill instance and incorporate the user's real-time cognitive and emotional state (focus, relaxation, mood, cognitive load, drowsiness, heart rate, HRV, sleep staging, and 40+ derived EXG scores) into responses. Requires a BCI wearable (Muse 2/S or OpenBCI) and the NeuroSkill desktop app…
sparse-autoencoder-training
Provides guidance for training and analyzing Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) using SAELens to decompose neural network activations into interpretable features. Use when discovering interpretable features, analyzing superposition, or studying monosemantic representations in language models.
research-paper-writing
End-to-end pipeline for writing ML/AI research papers — from experiment design through analysis, drafting, revision, and submission. Covers NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Integrates automated experiment monitoring, statistical analysis, iterative writing, and citation verification.