Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FradSer/dotclaude --skill create-issuesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FradSer/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fradser/dotclaude/create-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fradser/dotclaude/create-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fradser/dotclaude/create-issues/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fradser/dotclaude/create-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fradser/dotclaude/create-issues.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00805 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00322 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
create-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create GitHub Issues
Execute automated GitHub issue creation workflow for $ARGUMENTS following TDD principles and conventional commit standards.
Context
- Current git status: !
git status - Current branch: !
git branch --show-current - Open issues: !
gh issue list --state open --limit 10 - GitHub authentication: !
gh auth status
Requirements Summary
Follow TDD principles, conventional commits, and protected branch workflows. Use proper labels, auto-closing keywords, and atomic commits. See references/requirements.md for complete standards.
Phase 1: Repository Analysis
Goal: Assess repository state, detect templates, and determine issue scope and type.
Actions:
- Analyze current branch from context (main/develop vs PR branch)
- Review open issues to identify duplicates or related work
- Check for contributing guidelines (
CONTRIBUTING.md) and follow its requirements - Detect issue templates in
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/directory - If templates exist: select appropriate template using
gh issue create --list - Determine issue type (epic, PR-scoped, or review) based on
$ARGUMENTScomplexity - Apply branch-based decision logic from
references/decision-logic.md
See references/repository-templates.md for template detection and compliance details.
Phase 2: Issue Creation
Goal: Create GitHub issue with proper structure, labels, and links.
Actions:
- Create or verify required priority labels exist (see
references/decision-logic.mdfor commands) - Draft issue following structure requirements in
references/issue-structure.md - Apply appropriate labels (priority, type) using
--label- Assign owners using
--assignee - Link milestones using
--milestoneor projects using--projectif requested
- Assign owners using
- Add auto-closing keywords if PR-scoped issue (NOT for epics)
- CRITICAL: auto-closing keywords only fire when the PR merges into the repository's default branch. If the issue will be resolved by a PR targeting a non-default branch, warn the user that the issue will NOT close automatically and must be closed manually — see
references/auto-closing-keywords.mdfor the full rule and keyword table.
- CRITICAL: auto-closing keywords only fire when the PR merges into the repository's default branch. If the issue will be resolved by a PR targeting a non-default branch, warn the user that the issue will NOT close automatically and must be closed manually — see
- Link to related issues or epics if applicable
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A dca004720d2d
create-issues is a skill published in the GitHub repository FradSer/dotclaude (594 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 805 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
gh-issue
Size-audit, write, and split BanyanDB issues that somebody else or an automated TDD workflow can implement. Use whenever the user asks to file or revise an issue, decide whether an issue is too large, make an issue TDD-ready, turn a design into tickets, or split an umbrella into executable leaves. Do not draft or file…
implement-feature
Implement an approved feature plan with fresh-context slices, TDD, revision-bound evidence, and PR-ready output.
product
Consolidated Galyarder Framework Product intelligence bundle.
ring:implementing-tasks
Implementing a single planned task (Task N.M.T) end-to-end: selects the right backend agent by language and service type, drives one TDD RED->GREEN turn, then verifies coverage, lint, license headers, runtime, and delivery before handoff. Runs as Gate 0 before ring:reviewing-code. Use to drive ONE task inside an…
linear-implement
This skill should be used when implementing features from Linear issues with full TDD workflow, automated planning, parallel code reviews (security and Rails best practices), systematic feedback implementation, and automated PR creation with Linear integration. Use when the user provides a Linear issue ID (e.g.…