Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add frankxai/claude-skills-library --skill excellence-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/claude-skills-libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/claude-skills-library/excellence-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/claude-skills-library/excellence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankxai/claude-skills-library/excellence-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/claude-skills-library/excellence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankxai/claude-skills-library/excellence-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00223 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
excellence-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 19 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 06ec7e523389
excellence-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository frankxai/claude-skills-library (40 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 223 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pre-ship-review
Run a structured quality review before shipping code at any checkpoint such as PRs, releases, or milestones. Use whenever the user says.
use-workflow-tdd-cycle
A test-first coding process based on TDD, or test-driven development: write a failing test, make it pass, then improve the code.
test-case-reviewer-plus
Use this skill when you need structured test-case review findings from requirements, strategy, and case docs; triggers include test case reviewer plus and advanced test case review.
ai-generated-test-review
Use this skill when reviewing AI-generated unit, functional, API, or end-to-end tests for false confidence, weak assertions, missing risks, or unsafe test behavior; triggers include AI-generated test review and functional test review.
technical-quality-perspective
Use this skill when a technical quality perspective is needed for requirements, strategy, code, test cases, or reports; triggers include technical quality review, architecture review, and code review.
experiment-review
Analyze A/B tests and experiments with statistical rigor, assess significance, perform segment analysis, and produce a clear ship/kill/extend recommendation.