Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System/main/.grok/skills/excellence-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-SystemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/excellence-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/excellence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/excellence-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/excellence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankxai/starlight-intelligence-system/excellence-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00223 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00089 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
excellence-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to excellence-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Excellence Review Skill — Grok Harness
God 99 Mandate
- repo-mastery (read all rules files first, map cross-repo)
- CEO/Eng/Design plan reviews (subagent or delegate to claude)
- Adversarial: verification-loop + santa-method (2 independent pass required)
- gstack: qa (tiers quick/standard/exhaustive), browse, design-review, benchmark, canary
- Security: cso / security-auditor + supply chain
- Polish: rules-distill, skill-comply, document-release
Output format: report + before/after + artifacts. Iterate atomically.
Tools: gstack (headless browser ~100ms), terminal (tests), subagents.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 06ec7e523389
excellence-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository frankxai/Starlight-Intelligence-System (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 223 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to excellence-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
eval-code-quality
Specialized code quality evaluator for the Evaluate-Loop. Use this for evaluating code implementation tracks where the deliverable is functional code — features, API routes, state management, utilities. Checks build integrity, type safety, code patterns, error handling, dead code, imports, test coverage, and naming…
eval-integration
Specialized integration evaluator for the Evaluate-Loop. Use this for evaluating tracks that integrate external services — Supabase auth/DB, Stripe payments, Gemini API, third-party APIs. Checks API contracts, auth flows, data persistence, error recovery, environment config, and end-to-end flow integrity. Dispatched…
verify-3way
A release-checking process that combines automated regression tests, a fresh reproduction test, and a review against the written requirements. The fresh reproduction test starts from the original user problem without giving the tester background about the fix.
webapp-testing
Playwright-driven testing of local web apps.
maintain-verification-skill
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or "audit the verify skill".
Test Quality Inspector
Systematically inspect unit and E2E tests to verify they test the right behavior, provide meaningful coverage, and catch real regressions.