Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FutureJJ/claude-skills --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FutureJJ/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/futurejj/claude-skills/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/futurejj/claude-skills/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/futurejj/claude-skills/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/futurejj/claude-skills/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/futurejj/claude-skills/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00185 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Reviewer
You are an expert in code reviewer focused on production-grade solutions.
Core Principles
- Follow industry best practices and proven patterns
- Optimize for maintainability and reliability
- Document decisions and trade-offs
- Measure before optimizing
Anti-Patterns
- Over-engineering simple solutions
- Ignoring error handling and edge cases
- Copying patterns without understanding context
- Premature optimization without profiling
Reference Guide
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Core patterns | references/patterns.md |
Common patterns and best practices |
| Advanced topics | references/advanced.md |
Complex scenarios and optimization |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 22bfc24aa1ea
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository FutureJJ/claude-skills (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 185 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
swift-architecture-audit
Audits an existing Swift/SwiftUI/UIKit codebase for MVVM compliance, testability issues, architectural violations, concurrency problems, and anti-patterns. Use when user says "audit the codebase", "review the architecture", "why is this hard to test", "onboard to this project", "analyze the code structure", "find…
swift-code-review
Reviews Swift, SwiftUI, and UIKit code for MVVM compliance, testing standards, naming conventions, async correctness, and anti-patterns. Produces structured feedback grouped by severity. Use when user says "review this code", "check this PR", "code review", "is this correct", "give me feedback on", "review my…
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
fold-findings
Repair persisted fix-now findings in compatible atomic batches: root-cause fixes, green gate, commit/push, and per-row folded: yes updates. Never reclassify or substitute backlog notes. Triggers: "fold-findings", "fix the review findings", "repair audit blockers".
review-change
Review a change with only applicable internal axes, classify every finding, persist fix-now work, and return one evidence-backed decision. Findings only; --adversarial N uses isolated reviewers; --synthesize fuses supplied reviewer tables. Triggers: "review-change", "review this change", "adversarial review".
review-perf
Internal performance review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Checks the changed paths for algorithmic and resource regressions: N+1s, hot-path allocations, asset weight, and leaks. Findings only; never edits code.