Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructions --skill swift-architecture-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructions/swift-architecture-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructions/swift-architecture-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructions/swift-architecture-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructions/swift-architecture-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructions/swift-architecture-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.01366 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00546 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
swift-architecture-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Swift Architecture Audit
Instructions
Step 1: Explore the Project Structure
Identify the UI framework in use (SwiftUI, UIKit, or Mixed) by scanning the project — look for @main, UIApplicationDelegate, or UIHostingController. Then load the matching structure reference from ../swift-project-setup/references/ and use it as the baseline when identifying structural deviations.
Use subagents to parallelize exploration of large codebases.
Scan for:
- All feature folders and their naming patterns
- Number of
UIViewControllersubclasses vsViewModeltypes - Number of SwiftUI
Viewtypes - Presence of protocol files in
Core/orProtocols/ - Existing test targets and approximate test count
Step 2: MVVM Compliance Check
Read representative files from 3-5 key features. Look for:
Red flags (report each with file:line):
- Business logic, network calls, or storage access directly inside SwiftUI
Viewbodies - Business logic inside
UIViewControllersubclasses URLSession.sharedorUserDefaults.standardcalled from Views or ViewControllers- Missing ViewModel for any screen with non-trivial state
@Stateor@StateObjectholding data that belongs in a ViewModel or service
Green flags (note these):
ObservableObjector@ObservableViewModels with clear state- Services and repositories injected via initializer or
@Environment - Thin View layer (only layout and presentation)
- Coordinator / navigation layer separate from ViewModels
Step 3: Testability Assessment
For each audited type, check:
- Are dependencies hardcoded (
let service = NetworkService()) instead of injected? - Do networking/storage types hide behind protocols?
- Are global singletons used without injection support?
- Is there any existing test coverage? How much?
- Are ViewModels testable in isolation (no UIKit/SwiftUI imports)?
Scoring:
- High testability: Protocols + DI everywhere, existing tests
- Medium testability: Some DI, some singletons, few tests
- Low testability: No protocols, no DI, no tests — refactoring needed before testing is possible
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 4900ea632540
swift-architecture-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository jeremieb/swift-unit-test-instructions (4 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,366 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Code review practices including review checklists, refactoring patterns, PR best practices, and team conventions. Trigger for code review guidance, refactoring advice, or PR process design.
offensive-mobile
Mobile (Android + iOS) application penetration testing methodology. Covers static analysis (apktool/jadx for Android, class-dump/Hopper/IDA for iOS), dynamic instrumentation with Frida and Objection, SSL pinning bypass strategies, root/jailbreak detection bypass, deep-link / URL-scheme abuse, exported component…
fold-findings
Repair persisted fix-now findings in compatible atomic batches: root-cause fixes, green gate, commit/push, and per-row folded: yes updates. Never reclassify or substitute backlog notes. Triggers: "fold-findings", "fix the review findings", "repair audit blockers".
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
review-change
Review a change with only applicable internal axes, classify every finding, persist fix-now work, and return one evidence-backed decision. Findings only; --adversarial N uses isolated reviewers; --synthesize fuses supplied reviewer tables. Triggers: "review-change", "review this change", "adversarial review".
capstone-radar
Unified A-F grading and ship/no-ship decisions for the 6-skill radar family (5 companions + capstone). Aggregates handoffs from data-model, ui-path, roundtrip, time-bomb, and ui-enhancer; owns 5 grep-reliable domains; tracks velocity; celebrates improvements. Triggers: "capstone radar", "can I ship", "grade codebase"…