Librechat-Mobile: Skill for Claude Code

Audit i18n Coverage

Audit the localization surface and report what is missing, in a form the user can act on and re-run later.

You are the lead. You do Phase 0 yourself with direct Bash, then hand the analysis to the audit-i18n workflow, then independently re-assert what it claims. You do not attribute keys to features, triage candidates, or write the report yourself — the workflow fans that out.

The deterministic checker is the source of truth. scripts/i18n-coverage.py is the only thing that produces findings. The workflow explains findings that already exist; it never discovers them.

The skill is audit-only. It ends at findings + a recommended fix order. It never writes a translation, never edits a strings.xml, never adds a Gradle task or CI gate, never commits, never opens a PR.

The two layers, and why they are separate

Keep the seam clean. The instant an agent re-derives findings by grepping, the audit stops being comparable to the last one and the determinism you paid for is gone. Every number in the final report traces to the JSON; the workflow's contribution is feature names, dates, verdicts and priority.

Hard rule — do not re-derive findings by hand

Never grep for missing strings, diff strings.xml files with shell tools, or count keys yourself. Every number in your report must come out of the script.

The reason is not politeness, it is that a hand-rolled pass is not comparable to the next one. The script is byte-deterministic — identical input produces identical stdout on every run and every machine (no timestamps, no absolute paths, no set-iteration order). That is what makes a report diffable against the report from six weeks ago, and what lets the user prove a fix actually shrank the debt. An ad-hoc grep produces a number nobody can reproduce, and it systematically misses the things the script handles carefully: both directions of parity drift (a module with extras that cancel against its missing keys looks fine to a count comparison), values-night being a theme qualifier and not a locale, and the Android res/ surface being a separate thing that must not be folded into the parity math.