Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GaZmagik/iso-24495 --skill iso-24495-3git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GaZmagik/iso-24495Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gazmagik/iso-24495/iso-24495-3)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gazmagik/iso-24495/iso-24495-3"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gazmagik/iso-24495/iso-24495-3/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gazmagik/iso-24495/iso-24495-3"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gazmagik/iso-24495/iso-24495-3.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00743 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
iso-24495-3 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ISO 24495-3:2026 - Plain Language (Science and Technical Communication)
Extends ISO 24495-1:2023 for software architecture, technical documentation, algorithm explanations, code reviews, and scientific analysis.
Scope & Execution Boundaries
-
Thinking Block Exemption:
- Internal architectural analysis, code reasoning, and mental trace blocks (
<thought>,<thinking>) are 100% exempt from plain language constraints. - Reason freely within thinking blocks. Apply plain language rules strictly to final user-facing technical text.
- Internal architectural analysis, code reasoning, and mental trace blocks (
-
Code & Data Preservation Immunity:
- Code blocks, stack traces, abstract syntax tree (AST) dumps, terminal commands, and exact line quotes are completely immune to sentence length and simplification constraints. Never alter, abbreviate, or mangle working code or logs to fit text constraints.
Quantitative Rules & Hard Constraints (User-Facing Output)
-
Progressive Disclosure Ordering: Structure all technical explanations in three strict sequential stages:
- System Purpose: High-level operational intent (1 sentence).
- Architecture & Data Flow: Diagram (Mermaid) or summary table.
- Implementation Detail: Concrete code snippet with exact file citations.
-
File & Code Citation Standard:
- Quote exact file locations using markdown links with line numbers:
[filename](file:///path/to/file#L10-L20). - Never describe code changes or logic without citing the exact file and line range.
- Quote exact file locations using markdown links with line numbers:
-
Terminology & Acronym Standardisation:
- Define every acronym or domain-specific term upon first use in parentheses (e.g. "Abstract Syntax Tree (AST)").
- Use consistent symbol names across text, code snippets, and diagrams.
Contrastive Examples
Example 1: Concurrency Control Explanation
- ❌ Not aligned (Dense & Abstract):
In order to prevent race conditions during concurrent state mutations within the execution pipeline, a mutex lock mechanism is introduced prior to updating the shared buffer allocation in memory. - ✅ ISO 24495-3 Aligned:
Concurrency Control: Acquire a Mutex Lock to prevent data corruption during concurrent writes.
Implementation: The locking logic is implemented in
state_manager.rs:L45-L52:let _guard = self.mutex.lock().unwrap(); self.buffer.update(data);
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 73 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 5238367047df
iso-24495-3 is a skill published in the GitHub repository GaZmagik/iso-24495 (171 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 743 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-opportunity-radar
Run a cumulative daily or retrospective sweep of research papers on a chosen topic, audit their claims, methods, integrity signals, and independent support, then identify overlooked but feasible project or business opportunities in a detailed source-grounded report. Use when asked to monitor papers every day, mine…
paper-writing
Use when the user wants to write, structure, or revise academic paper sections, improve notation consistency, or refine figures and tables. Triggers on phrases like "write the abstract", "structure the methods", "improve this section", "notation consistency", "figure refinement", or "paper structure".
reproduce
End-to-end paper reproduction from arxiv URL through smoke runs to replication experiments. Handles missing or partial official code, missing training scripts, missing hyperparameters, and private datasets via similar-public-dataset substitution. Use when the user asks to reproduce, implement, replicate, or re-run a…
using-cesiumjs-skills
Use when starting any conversation involving CesiumJS development - provides orientation on available domain skills and how they activate.
smt-solving-with-z3-cvc5
Use when a query needs direct SMT solving, an unsat core needs debugging, or another tool reports a solver timeout or unknown. Not for deciding what to prove: use proof-driven.
fulcra-lab-results
Parse a lab-report PDF (LabCorp, Quest, hospital labs — any provider) into one canonical Fulcra data track per marker (LDL-C, HbA1c, TSH, ferritin, …). You read the PDF; the fulcra-labs engine normalizes units, validates, and ingests. Verify-before-ingest: nothing is written without passing validation or explicit…