document-release

document-release is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from GCWing/BitFun. It costs 95 tokens per session (3,515 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A post-release documentation review that updates project guides to match code that has shipped. It checks files such as the README, architecture notes, contribution guide, changelog, todos, and version information.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after shipping to synchronize factual documentation, polish changelog wording, clean up completed todos, and decide whether a version should be bumped.
Why use it?
It prevents documentation from describing old behavior, paths, counts, or completed tasks after a release.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — built for gstack. Also seen: mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it after shipping to synchronize factual documentation, polish changelog wording, clean up completed todos, and decide whether a version should be bumped.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gcwing/bitfun/gstack-document-release
About the project

BitFun is a desktop AI agent that turns tasks into interactive mini-apps while also writing code, creating documents, and controlling computers. It is for software development and general desktop work across Windows, macOS, and Linux. Its catalogue entries extend the agent with skills, agents, and instructions.

GCWing/BitFun · 2,077 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add GCWing/BitFun --skill gstack-document-release
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GCWing/BitFun

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for document-release

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gcwing/bitfun/gstack-document-release/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gcwing/bitfun/gstack-document-release)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gcwing/bitfun/gstack-document-release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gcwing/bitfun/gstack-document-release/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for document-release

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gcwing/bitfun/gstack-document-release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gcwing/bitfun/gstack-document-release.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 95 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,515 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Tool Misuse · line 328
    Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).
    Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 37
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 227
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00095 $0.03515
Opus 5.5 $0.00038 $0.01406
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00703
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00351

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 3f02e7ff7712, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

document-release scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

src/crates/assembly/core/builtin_skills/gstack-document-release/SKILL.md · 369 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 369 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Document Release: Post-Ship Documentation Update

You are running the /document-release workflow. This runs after /ship (code committed, PR exists or about to exist) but before the PR merges. Your job: ensure every documentation file in the project is accurate, up to date, and written in a friendly, user-forward voice.

You are mostly automated. Make obvious factual updates directly. Stop and ask only for risky or subjective decisions.

Only stop for:

  • Risky/questionable doc changes (narrative, philosophy, security, removals, large rewrites)
  • VERSION bump decision (if not already bumped)
  • New TODOS items to add
  • Cross-doc contradictions that are narrative (not factual)

Never stop for:

  • Factual corrections clearly from the diff
  • Adding items to tables/lists
  • Updating paths, counts, version numbers
  • Fixing stale cross-references
  • CHANGELOG voice polish (minor wording adjustments)
  • Marking TODOS complete
  • Cross-doc factual inconsistencies (e.g., version number mismatch)

NEVER do:

  • Overwrite, replace, or regenerate CHANGELOG entries — polish wording only, preserve all content
  • Bump VERSION without asking — always use AskUserQuestion for version changes
  • Use Write tool on CHANGELOG.md — always use Edit with exact old_string matches

OpenBitFun Dispatch

When this skill is invoked by OpenBitFun, this skill supplies the documentation-release methodology. Use existing Task sub-agents for read-only doc drift discovery, then keep edits in the main session.

  • Do not assume a Technical Writer sub-agent exists. Choose only from the Task tool's available agents.
  • Prefer matching custom docs/writing sub-agents if available; otherwise use Explore for diff-to-doc mapping and locating impacted docs.
  • Good parallel Task tracks: README/API drift, architecture docs drift, changelog/release-note gaps, and TODO cleanup candidates.
  • Do not ask Task sub-agents to edit docs. Require evidence: changed behavior, affected docs, stale statements, and suggested wording.
  • The main session owns all doc edits and risky narrative questions.

Read the full file on GitHub · 369 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed 3f02e7ff7712
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 369 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A bad0b0a4beb6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

document-release is a skill published in the GitHub repository GCWing/BitFun (2,077 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 3,515 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

agentteams-migrate

Analyze current OpenClaw setup and generate a migration package (ZIP) for importing into AgentTeams as a managed Worker.

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams · 28 tokens

worker-management

Use when admin requests hand-creating or resetting a Worker, starting/stopping a Worker, managing Worker skills, enabling peer mentions, or opening a QwenPaw console. Use agentteams-find-worker only as a helper for Nacos-backed market import or when task assignment needs you to discover a suitable Worker.

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams · 65 tokens

team-coordination

Use before deciding how you should organize team work: DAG vs Loop, dependency shape, task waves, quality gates, acceptance criteria, interruption, replanning, or what to do after Worker results arrive. Always use this skill for team organization strategy before you call project-management or task-management.

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams · 61 tokens

git-delegation

A procedure for sending Git version-control commands to a separate Manager instead of running them directly. Git is the tool used to track code changes and work with repositories.

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams · 51 tokens

github-operations

A tool for managing GitHub pull requests and issues. Pull requests are proposed code changes for review, while issues are GitHub's way to track bugs, tasks, and questions.

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams · 50 tokens

teamharness-task-delegation

Use when you act as Leader to turn ready Quick Task or Project Work state into Worker task instructions, send assignment messages, check submitted results, and define completion/blocker report contracts. Do not use to create projects, create rooms, or execute Worker tasks.

agentscope-ai/AgentTeams · 59 tokens