Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent --skill academic-paper-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GGbond-bo/MemOmics-AgentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/academic-paper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/academic-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/academic-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 428 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.08393 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.04196 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01679 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00839 |
Grade A, and why
academic-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 505 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
规则N: 运行记录只是参考,不能跳过审查
- skill_evolution(action="query_logs") 返回的历史运行日志仅供参数参考
- 即使有 quality_score=9.0 的历史日志,仍必须执行 rail_review(pre)、debate_analysis、rail_review(post)
- 禁止因"之前跑过"而跳过任何审查步骤
- 禁止直接用历史日志里的脚本运行而不经本次审查
- 运行日志是"参考"不是"免审凭证"
Academic Paper Reviewer v1.10.0 — Multi-Perspective Academic Paper Review Agent Team
Simulates a complete international journal peer review process: automatically identifies the paper's field, dynamically configures 5 reviewers (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) who review from five non-overlapping perspectives — journal fit, methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges — then uses a separate editorial synthesizer to produce a structured Editorial Decision and Revision Roadmap.
v1.1 Improvements:
- Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer — specifically challenges core arguments, detects logical fallacies, and identifies the strongest counter-arguments
- Added
re-reviewmode — verification review, focused on checking whether revisions address the review comments - Expanded review team from 4 to 5 members
Routing discipline (v3.9.2): see
.claude/CLAUDE.md"Routing Discipline (v3.9.2)" +shared/references/intent_clarification_protocol.mdfor cross-skill routing rules. This skill assumes routing has already settled — ambiguous cross-phase materials should have been clarified upstream.
Quick Start
Simplest command:
Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file]
Output:
- Automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology type
- Dynamically configures the specific identities and expertise of 5 reviewers
- 5 independent review reports (each from a different perspective)
- 1 Editorial Decision Letter + Revision Roadmap
Trigger Conditions
Trigger Keywords
English: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy
What ships with it
27 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md 41 KB
- agents/domain_reviewer_agent.md 31 KB
- agents/editorial_synthesizer_agent.md 39 KB
- agents/eic_agent.md 27 KB
- agents/field_analyst_agent.md 10 KB
- agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.md 43 KB
- agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.md 32 KB
- examples/hei_paper_review_example.md 33 KB
- examples/interdisciplinary_review_example.md 26 KB
- examples/subclaim_decomposition_example.md 8.1 KB
- references/calibration_mode_protocol.md 30 KB
- references/changelog.md 985 B
- references/editorial_decision_standards.md 13 KB
- references/guided_mode_protocol.md 2.0 KB
- references/integration_guide.md 695 B
- references/quality_rubrics.md 7.7 KB
- references/re_review_mode_protocol.md 51 KB
- references/review_criteria_framework.md 10 KB
- references/review_quality_thinking.md 3.3 KB
- references/reviewer_sprint_prompt_source.md 48 KB
- references/sprint_contract_protocol.md 32 KB
- references/statistical_reporting_standards.md 30 KB
- references/top_journals_by_field.md 13 KB
- skill.json 1015 B
- templates/editorial_decision_template.md 9.5 KB
- templates/peer_review_report_template.md 14 KB
- templates/revision_response_template.md 7.7 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 505 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 36c01671d5d8
academic-paper-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent (19 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 8,393 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…