Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gongshichen/luminacode/completion-checknpx skills add GongShichen/LuminaCode --skill completion-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GongShichen/LuminaCodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongshichen/luminacode/completion-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongshichen/luminacode/completion-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongshichen/luminacode/completion-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00283 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00142 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
Completion Check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 25 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 311b75427cd6
Completion Check is a skill published in the GitHub repository GongShichen/LuminaCode (122 stars, last pushed 15d ago), with no licence file. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 283 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
wayfinder
Plan a huge chunk of work (more than one agent session can hold) as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.
sap-transport-overview
System-wide inventory of open transport requests — every visible modifiable request, who owns it, how big it is, and supported risk signals such as empty/local requests, explicit locks, and confirmed manifest overlaps. Headers-only and cheap; NO source diffs. Use when asked "what transports are open in the system"…
timeline-creator
Create HTML timelines and project roadmaps with Gantt charts, milestones, phase groupings, and progress indicators. Use when users request timelines, roadmaps, Gantt charts, project schedules, or milestone visualizations.
pm-all
Skill "pm-all" from wei63w/pm-manager, covering user input, outline and shared workflow (all /pm- commands).
bootstrap-prd
Set up PRD-driven development infrastructure for a new project, including directory structure, templates, and roadmap.
finn-spec
Interview the user about a raw idea until confident, then file a build-ready issue in Linear. Use when asked to run Finn-loop's spec interview, draft a queue-ready issue, or plan a feature. Interactive — requires the user present; never run unattended.