Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add graniet/kheish --skill requesting-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/graniet/kheishWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/graniet/kheish/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/graniet/kheish/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/graniet/kheish/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/graniet/kheish/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/graniet/kheish/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 52 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 123 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 124 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.02275 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00910 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00455 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
os.system(f"ls {user_input}") How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 305 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Kheish Compatibility
This skill is repo-local and stays inactive until explicitly activated.
When the original instructions refer to legacy tool names, use these Kheish mappings:
terminal=>bashweb_extract=>web_fetch, plusweb_searchwhen discovery is neededsearch_files=>grep_searchandglob_searchbrowser_*tools require a browser-capable surfaced tool or MCP; if none is available, use the closest available surface and say so explicitly
When the instructions mention local helper files, resolve them from ${KHEISH_SKILL_DIR}.
Pre-Commit Code Verification
Automated verification pipeline before code lands. Static scans, baseline-aware quality gates, an independent reviewer subagent, and an auto-fix loop.
Core principle: No agent should verify its own work. Fresh context finds what you miss.
When to Use
- After implementing a feature or bug fix, before
git commitorgit push - When user says "commit", "push", "ship", "done", "verify", or "review before merge"
- After completing a task with 2+ file edits in a git repo
- After each task in subagent-driven-development (the two-stage review)
Skip for: documentation-only changes, pure config tweaks, or when user says "skip verification".
This skill vs github-code-review: This skill verifies YOUR changes before committing.
github-code-review reviews OTHER people's PRs on GitHub with inline comments.
Step 1 — Get the diff
git diff --cached
If empty, try git diff then git diff HEAD~1 HEAD.
If git diff --cached is empty but git diff shows changes, tell the user to
git add <files> first. If still empty, run git status — nothing to verify.
If the diff exceeds 15,000 characters, split by file:
git diff --name-only
git diff HEAD -- specific_file.py
Step 2 — Static security scan
Scan added lines only. Any match is a security concern fed into Step 5.
# Hardcoded secrets
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -iE "(api_key|secret|password|token|passwd)\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]{6,}['\"]"
# Shell injection
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "os\.system\(|subprocess.*shell=True"
# Dangerous eval/exec
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "\beval\(|\bexec\("
# Unsafe deserialization
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "pickle\.loads?\("
# SQL injection (string formatting in queries)
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "execute\(f\"|\.format\(.*SELECT|\.format\(.*INSERT"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 305 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 5695c117c03e
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository graniet/kheish (217 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 2,275 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Comprehensive security and correctness audit. Use for review, deep review, thermo nuclear, or thermonuclear requests and branch or PR diff audits.
ha-code-review
Hope-native review of uncommitted, staged, commit, branch, or PR changes: discover concrete regressions, independently verify candidates, and report actionable findings first without speculative noise.
Smart Code Review
Review a PR diff: triage its severity, then produce a depth-appropriate review with structured findings, fix suggestions, and a merge decision. Use for code review, review PR, and severity triage requests.
code-review
Review local code changes. Uses an isolated sub-agent for unbiased analysis when the main agent wrote the code; reviews directly in fresh review-only sessions. Checks correctness, conventions, performance, tests, security, and tech design compliance. Use when the user wants a code review or says "review the diff" /…
maf-anti-pattern-scanner
Scans a MAF 1.3.0 codebase for known anti-patterns AFTER migration is complete. Prefer the MCP tool MafScanAntiPatterns for one-shot scans; this skill is for understanding the rule taxonomy or contributing new anti-pattern rules. Detects insecure credential usage (DefaultAzureCredential, hard-coded keys), unsafe…
review-code-change
Review a code change for concrete defects, regressions, security risk, and missing tests. Use for pull requests, diffs, patches, and pre-release quality checks.