lab-builder

A tool for creating small, hands-on learning projects with toy data, fictional workflows, or cleaned-up examples.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build a learning lab with milestones, practice, a recall check, reflection, and a suggested follow-up review.
Why use it?
It gives learners a safe way to understand a concept and produce a portfolio artefact without using real company work or sensitive information.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/grcengineering/companion/lab-builder
Any agent
npx skills add grcengineering/companion --skill lab-builder
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/grcengineering/companion

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 62 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 569 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00062 $0.00569
Opus 5 $0.00031 $0.00284
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00114
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00057

Measured 2d ago against content hash 09cf1c91b599, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

lab-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/lab-builder/SKILL.md · 65 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

lab-builder

What

Generate a project-based learning lab that helps the learner build a small artefact without operating their real GRC programme.

When

  • The learner wants hands-on practice.
  • The learner wants a portfolio project.
  • The learner wants to learn a concept by building something small.
  • The learner has a role-specific learning goal and needs a concrete exercise.

Not For

  • Producing final policies, audit evidence, live vendor decisions, or control outputs.
  • Turning sensitive company artefacts into deliverables.
  • Question-led discovery before a lab exists. Use socratic-coach.

Inputs

  • Optional profile template: assets/profile-template.md
  • Role prompt templates:
    • assets/templates/employed.md
    • assets/templates/job-seeking.md
    • assets/templates/career-transition.md

Steps

  1. Gather only learning-safe learner context.
  2. Clarify the learning objective and timebox.
  3. Choose a toy workflow, fictional dataset, or sanitized artefact.
  4. Sequence the lab into small milestones.
  5. Add at least one active recall checkpoint.
  6. Add a reflection question and one next review suggestion.

Validation

  • The lab can be completed inside the stated time budget.
  • The artefact is demonstrably learning-safe and non-operational.
  • The learner has build steps, recall checks, and a reflection close.

Gotchas

  • If the learner provides company-specific data, refuse to process it as evidence and ask for a fictional substitute.
  • If the requested lab exceeds the timebox, cap milestones at the budget and defer the rest.
  • If no learning-safe artefact exists, switch to socratic-coach or concept-tutor before building.

Failure Modes

  • Lab becomes consulting: remove real approval, remediation, audit, policy, or control actions.
  • Lab is too big: split into a 30-90 minute first rep.
  • Lab is too abstract: require a small output such as a toy checklist, map, script, table, or explainer.

Examples

  • User asks for a portfolio project in TPRM -> Create a fictional vendor intake dataset and a toy risk-signal map with explain-back questions.
  • User wants to understand evidence automation -> Build a small local CSV-to-summary exercise using fake control evidence rows.
  • User asks for help preparing a live audit -> Refuse the operational prep, then offer a fictional audit walkthrough lab.

Read the full file on GitHub · 65 lines

Files

What ships with it

8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 65 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 09cf1c91b599

Subscribe to this mod's changes

lab-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository grcengineering/companion (32 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 569 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

control-mapping

Maps NIST controls to FedRAMP requirements and documents. Use when helping with control implementation, compliance mapping, security baseline alignment, or understanding control requirements.

hackIDLE/fedramp-docs-mcp · 35 tokens

frmr-analysis

Analyzes FedRAMP FRMR documents to extract control mappings, KSI entries, and version changes. Use when the user asks about FedRAMP requirements, control mappings, compliance data, or needs to understand FRMR document content.

hackIDLE/fedramp-docs-mcp · 51 tokens

GRC & Compliance

Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation.

Masriyan/Claude-Code-CyberSecurity-Skill · 58 tokens

mapping-builder

Build a reviewed crosswalk (RequirementMappingSet YAML library + review xlsx/csv) between two CISO Assistant framework YAML files using Claude itself as the reasoning engine. Zero infrastructure — stdlib + pyyaml only, no embedders, no LM Studio, no Qdrant. Use when the user asks to map / crosswalk / generate a…

intuitem/ciso-assistant-community · 164 tokens

reference-controls-enricher

Enrich a CISO Assistant framework YAML by linking each assessable requirement to reference control URNs from the central doc-pol library (CISO Assistant Key Reference Controls). Produces a reviewable xlsx and patches the framework YAML in place. Use when the user asks to "add reference controls to framework X", "link…

intuitem/ciso-assistant-community · 102 tokens

ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment

Guide users through a basic risk assessment workflow in CISO Assistant, from asset identification to scenario creation. Use when: (1) User wants to start a risk assessment from scratch (2) User mentions "risk assessment", "identify risks", "threat scenarios", or "risk register" (3) User asks about qualitative vs…

intuitem/ciso-assistant-community · 138 tokens