Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add griffinwork40/agent-afk --skill simplifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/simplify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/simplify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griffinwork40/agent-afk/simplify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 40 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 47 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01746 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00698 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
simplify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- simplify — 95% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sub-agent contract
/contract
Overview
/simplify is a discovery-and-prioritization skill, not a correctness auditor (that is /review's job) and not a blind executor (that is /refactor's job). It answers: what incidental complexity, duplication, and dead weight exists in this code, and what is safe to remove? Default mode is read-only: a ranked reduction plan is emitted but nothing is changed. Writes only happen when --apply is explicitly passed.
Scope is diff-bounded by default (git diff origin/main, or working-tree/HEAD if no remote). Pass --all for a whole-repo sweep (where duplication and dead-code analysis pay off most). Pass an explicit [target] path or PR reference to override both. Code with no test coverage is safe to analyze but must never be auto-applied — the skill surfaces that gap and recommends /simplify [target] --all after adding tests, or produces the plan and stops.
Argument parsing
| Argument | Effect |
|---|---|
| (none) | Scope = git diff origin/main (working-tree fallback) |
[target] |
Explicit path, glob, or PR ref |
--all |
Whole-repo sweep; excludes node_modules/, dist/, generated files |
--apply |
Opt-in write mode; default is read-only plan |
Parse arguments before dispatching Wave 1. Resolve scope to a concrete file list or diff stat and attach it to every sub-agent prompt.
Wave 1 — Parallel discovery (read-only)
Dispatch all four lenses simultaneously as research-agent sub-agents. All are strictly read-only — no writes, no installs that modify package.json. Optional tooling (jscpd, knip) is an accelerant only; degrade to grep/structural reasoning when absent or network-gated.
(a) Duplication / clone detection
Find exact and near-duplicate logic blocks across modules within scope. Optionally seed with:
npx jscpd <scope> --reporters json --silent
If jscpd is absent, use grep for literal repetition and structural reasoning for semantic clones. Output: clone clusters with file:line ranges, estimated token overlap, and a suggested extraction site.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 126 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A a984a5078729
simplify is a skill published in the GitHub repository griffinwork40/agent-afk (61 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,746 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hunk-launch-video
Produces Hunk videos by driving the real TUI headlessly in a PTY, compositing captioned 1080p frames in Chromium, and encoding with ffmpeg. Use for feature demos, workflow explainers, announcements, launch videos, and full-release roundups.
hunk-release
Prepares, publishes, verifies, and curates Hunk releases. Use for release metadata, benchmarks, tags, publishing, release videos, backports, or recovery.
md-audit
Read-only code quality audit — scan the current working directory for common issues (bugs, dead code, security hotspots, missing error handling) and return a prioritised findings report. No files are edited. Use when asked to "audit the code", "quick audit", "find issues", "code scan", or "what's wrong with this…
code-review
Reviewing code for defects: diff-first reading, severity classification, evidence over inference, finding caps, and terminal verdicts. Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or patch, or auditing someone else's work.
responding-to-review
Answering review findings: verify each claim before implementing, no performative agreement, per-item fix/reject/defer with evidence, one batched remediation round. Use when responding to review or remediation rounds.
coderabbit-review
Unified CodeRabbit CLI execution via WSL with self-healing loop. Use this skill when running automated code review before commits, PRs, or QA gates. Handles WSL wrapper, severity filtering, and auto-fix iterations.