Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GrillerGeek/idd-framework --skill idd-review-specgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GrillerGeek/idd-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/grillergeek/idd-framework/idd-review-spec)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/grillergeek/idd-framework/idd-review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/grillergeek/idd-framework/idd-review-spec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/grillergeek/idd-framework/idd-review-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/grillergeek/idd-framework/idd-review-spec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00159 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
idd-review-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago First seen · 12 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 74f5bda6b641
idd-review-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository GrillerGeek/idd-framework (6 stars, last pushed 26d ago), with no licence file. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 159 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other skills, from other repositories
nasde-benchmark-calibration
Calibrate assessment rubrics by reviewing agent work in GitHub/GitLab PRs and feeding human comments back into the rubric. Use this skill when the user wants to: Calibrate, tune, or sanity-check assessment criteria / dimensions of a benchmark Review trial diffs alongside the LLM-as-a-Judge scores in a PR/MR…
refactor-expert
Guide safe, incremental refactoring that improves code quality without changing behavior.
dxkit-action
Read a dxkit report and execute fixes — prioritize findings by severity, plan the fix sequence, run the fix, verify the score moved, re-baseline if appropriate. Supports a SCOPED pass to burn down one category at a time (dependency/BOM vulnerabilities, security, code quality, tests, docs), and a BASELINE-CLEANUP pass…
code-hygiene
Periodic code-hygiene audit of a repository or subsystem: low-value or implementation-coupled tests, test-only production seams, dead code, placeholders, commented-out history, swallowed errors, stale references, and oversized units. Read-only by default; produces an evidence ledger, then fixes one coherent batch at a…
confidence-based-strictness
Use when the complexity or unfamiliarity of a task should increase guardrail enforcement. Scales verification depth based on how confident the system is in the correctness of the generated code.
derive-tests
Use only after the lock (gate 2b) is on record for the slice portion, to derive the fidelity ledger and acceptance scenarios from the locked prototype. Triggers when a portion is newly locked or re-locked. Never use before the lock, and never use it to hand-author prototype-fidelity test cases from prose.