Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add grovs-io/mcp --skill grovs-manage-linksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/grovs-io/mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/grovs-io/mcp/grovs-manage-links)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/grovs-io/mcp/grovs-manage-links"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/grovs-io/mcp/grovs-manage-links/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/grovs-io/mcp/grovs-manage-links"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/grovs-io/mcp/grovs-manage-links.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00653 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
grovs-manage-links scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Grovs: Manage Links
ID types — this is where LLMs mess up
| What the user gives you | What you need | How to get it |
|---|---|---|
| Link name or URL | numeric link_id |
search_links → use the id field from results |
| Full URL or path slug | link details | get_link with path (accepts both) |
| Wants to update | numeric link_id |
from search_links or get_link response |
get_link accepts a full URL (https://myapp.grovs.io/summer-sale) or just the slug (summer-sale) — the server extracts the path. update_link takes a numeric ID. Never pass a path to update_link.
Key behaviors
- If you already have the project_id from this conversation, skip
get_status. search_linksreturns metrics (views, opens, installs) per link — useful for quick performance checks without the analytics tools.update_linkis a partial update — only send fields the user wants to change.- To assign a link to a campaign: pass
campaign_idinupdate_link.
Archiving links
archive_link permanently deactivates a link — it stops redirecting users. This cannot be undone. Always confirm with the user before calling.
archive_link takes project_id + numeric link_id (not a path slug). If the user says "delete the summer-sale link," you need to look up the numeric ID first via search_links or get_link.
Pagination
search_links returns paginated results with meta.page, meta.total_pages, and meta.total_entries. If the user says "show more" or "next page," call search_links again with page: current + 1 using the same filters.
Example
User: "Change the summer sale link to point to the new promo screen"
1. search_links(project_id: "p_m9f", search: "summer sale")
→ finds: {id: 42, name: "Summer Sale", path: "summer-sale", ...}
2. update_link(project_id: "p_m9f", link_id: 42, data: {"screen": "new-promo"})
→ updated
If something fails
- "Link not found" on
get_link→ the path slug might be wrong. Usesearch_linkswith a search term instead. update_linkwith an invalidlink_id→ re-check by searching first.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 54 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 0dede5ed4d4f
grovs-manage-links is a skill published in the GitHub repository grovs-io/mcp (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 653 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
skillnote
Self-hosted skill registry for OpenClaw. Stores procedures your team writes (name, description, body), syncs them to disk before each task, and collects which-helped/which-failed signals from the agent so the registry improves over time.
chatcrystal-debug-recall
Recall ChatCrystal memories for debugging tasks involving failing tests, compiler errors, runtime exceptions, dependency issues, environment breakage, or performance regressions. Use when historical root causes, fixes, or pitfalls may accelerate diagnosis before proposing a fix.
collection
Choose which SkillNote skill collection is active for this Codex project. Use when the user says "change collection", "switch skills", "use frontend skills", or "show collections".
verify
Fact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.
megalinter-check
Collect MegaLinter lint errors for the current repository. Use when the user wants to know if the code passes linting, why the MegaLinter CI job fails, or before/after fixing lint errors. Two modes - watch a CI job (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines) and parse its logs, or run MegaLinter…
assistant
Assistant — on any repo, scan README→docs→AGENTS→CONTRIBUTING→PR templates→task runners→devcontainer→CI→configs before code; cite sources; prefer AGENTS.md for agent behavior; portable across Cursor/Copilot/Claude; use agent-toolkit CLI when needed.