Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hamzabellouch/agent-skills --skill academic-nature-nature-proposal-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamzabellouch/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-nature-nature-proposal-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-nature-nature-proposal-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-nature-nature-proposal-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-nature-nature-proposal-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hamzabellouch/agent-skills/academic-nature-nature-proposal-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01511 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00756 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00302 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
researchwrite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
researchwrite — proposal-first 科研写作 pipeline
受 autonovel（状态机+打分）、professor（动态专家）、brainstorming（入口追问）、anti-AI-writing（语言清理）启发的科研写作状态机。不是通用"帮我写论文"prompt。
核心原则
- 证据先于文字 — 起草前必须建立或读取
research_canon和evidence_table - 论证先于章节 — 写正文前必须完成
argument_map - 契约先于段落 — 每节需要 purpose / allowed claims / forbidden claims / inputs / validation
- 范围先于完备 — 如果是分阶段写作，先锁定阶段边界
- 动态专家，不设固定池 — 用
professor按失败模式召唤对应专家 - 内容先于语言 — 诊断科学逻辑后再做 anti-slop / 语言打磨
- 不自动升级事实 — 永远不把 "may indicate" 改成 "proves"，除非有证据支撑
- 删除胜于解释 — 当某主张不可行，直接删除。正文干净，解释留给答辩
- 该停就停 — 平台期、专家冲突、证据缺失是停止理由，不是润色理由
模式分派
| 输入 | 模式 |
|---|---|
| 题目、方向、模糊想法 | compose — 加载 references/compose-mode.md |
| 已有段落/章节/完整 proposal | revise — 加载 references/revise-mode.md |
| 已有草稿 + 扩写/补写/重构 | hybrid — 加载 references/hybrid-mode.md |
模糊时推断默认模式。只在选择会改变工作流时才问用户。
项目结构
工作目录：<outputs>/researchwrite/<project-slug>/
标准文件：
00_scope.md 写作任务边界
01_research_canon.md 硬事实和约束
02_evidence_table.md claim → evidence 映射表
03_argument_map.md 论证架构
04_section_contracts.md 每节的 purpose / inputs / allowed & forbidden claims
05_style_guide.md 风格、术语、禁用表达
state.json 项目状态（mode、round、scores、technical_debts）
sources/ 用户材料、文献、数据
drafts/ 草稿和分节文件
revision_briefs/ 修订简报
qa_logs/ 诊断、专家审查、anti-slop、打分记录
exports/ 最终输出（.md + .docx）
新建项目时从 templates/ 取空模板。references/worked-example-quaternary-proposal.md 提供了基于通用材料科学领域的完整填写示例。
Reference 文件索引
公开版本包含四个关键 reference：
| Reference | 用途 |
|---|---|
references/evaluation-rubric.md |
8 维 × 4 锚点评分体系 + 评分流程 |
references/stopping-rules.md |
迭代循环终止条件 |
references/foundation-files.md |
建立 foundation 五文件 |
references/validation-checklist.md |
自动校验清单 |
完整 reference 文件（compose/revise/hybrid 模式详解、专家分派、导出归档、综述框架等 12 份）未包含在公开版本中。如需获取，请通过 GitHub issue 或邮件联系作者。
What ships with it
16 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- manifest.yaml 2.2 KB
- README_EN.md 2.3 KB
- README.md 2.0 KB
- references/evaluation-rubric.md 6.0 KB
- references/foundation-files.md 1.1 KB
- references/stopping-rules.md 497 B
- references/validation-checklist.md 1.7 KB
- scripts/build_proposal_docx.py 6.7 KB runs code
- templates/00_scope.md 339 B
- templates/01_research_canon.md 192 B
- templates/02_evidence_table.md 200 B
- templates/03_argument_map.md 389 B
- templates/04_section_contracts.md 140 B
- templates/05_style_guide.md 226 B
- templates/qa_report.md 344 B
- templates/revision_brief.md 190 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 136 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 6ae69532c82a
researchwrite is a skill published in the GitHub repository hamzabellouch/agent-skills (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,511 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
semantic-scholar-deep
Deep research over the Semantic Scholar Graph API. Covers endpoints missing from allenai's lookup skill — paper references (backward citations), recommendations, batch paper lookup (up to 500 IDs), snippet search, and multi-hop citation graph traversal (BFS forward/backward). Use when the user asks to build a citation…
thesis-control
Use when AI-assisted thesis or manuscript edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of intended use, experiment-role promotion, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides author-intent control, lightweight or strict contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
manuscript-reframe
Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.
aerospace-engineering-technician
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineering and Operations Technologist/Technician — verifying an installed fastener's preload against a drawing's torque callout via the T=K·D·F relationship, reducing strain-gauge data from a structural proof-load test into stress and checking it against an…
agricultural-engineer
Use when a task needs the judgment of an agricultural engineer — sizing a center-pivot or drip irrigation system's peak capacity against crop water demand, computing lateral grain-bin wall pressure with Janssen's equation, sizing a waterway or tile-drainage system with Manning's equation and an NRCS design-storm…
agricultural-sciences-professor
Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track or tenured Agricultural Sciences faculty member at a land-grant university — deciding whether to submit a grant this cycle versus wait, allocating time across the teaching/research/extension appointment split, diagnosing a stalled graduate student or field trial, or…