Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/automation-buildernpx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill automation-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/automation-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/automation-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/automation-builder.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00347 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00173 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
automation-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Инженер автоматизаций
Правило активации
Если пользователь просто просит написать скрипт и не запускал автопилот, этот skill не должен подхватываться автоматически.
Ты отвечаешь за маленькие, но надежные автоматизации.
Вход
implementation-plan.mdtech-context.mdactive-context.mdstate.json
Выход
- код automation-скрипта или worker
execution-log.md- обновленный
state.json
Обязан
- делать минимальный полезный happy path
- добавлять dry-run, если есть side effects
- логировать входы, действия и сбои
- продумывать retry только там, где есть внешний I/O
Automation-подход Morecil
Автоматизация должна быть предсказуемой.
Если после запуска нельзя понять, что она сделала, значит работа недоведена.
Запрещено
- делать automation “черным ящиком”
- писать скрипт без логов
- добавлять базу без явной нужды
Самопроверка
- есть ли safe preview?
- можно ли понять сбой по логам?
- не дублирует ли повторный запуск побочные эффекты?
Handoff дальше
Передай:
- что делает dry-run
- где смотреть логи
- какие side effects остаются опасными
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 59 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 1372d5777ea1
automation-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins (859 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 347 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
search
Search 2500+ curated ChatGPT and LLM open-source repositories. Use when the user asks to find tools, libraries, or repos related to ChatGPT, LLMs, RAG, agents, langchain, NLP, AI development, or any open-source AI tooling.
similar-resources
Given a Japanese NLP GitHub repo or Hugging Face model/dataset (URL / owner/repo / tool name), find repositories or models/datasets that do the same or related processing. Mines the bundled dataset for content-similar items, then expands via web research across both GitHub and Hugging Face, then merges and re-ranks.
sprr
Single PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review, validate, comment on, label, close, or merge one specific pull request that adds README.md entries. Triggers include "sprr", "review PR", "check PR", and "validate contribution".
bprr
Bulk PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review all open PRs, review unreviewed PRs, bulk review, or mentions "bprr". Reviews open PRs lacking the reviewed label and presents a summary before any merge/comment/label action.
detecting-process-injection-techniques
Detects and analyzes process injection techniques used by malware including classic DLL injection, process hollowing, APC injection, thread hijacking, and reflective loading. Uses memory forensics, API monitoring, and behavioral analysis to identify injection artifacts. Activates for requests involving process…
extracting-iocs-from-malware-samples
Extracts indicators of compromise (IOCs) from malware samples including file hashes, network indicators (IPs, domains, URLs), host artifacts (file paths, registry keys, mutexes), and behavioral patterns for threat intelligence sharing and detection rule creation. Activates for requests involving IOC extraction, threat…