Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/hdu-ailab/easyresearch/ssh-experimentnpx skills add hdu-ailab/EasyResearch --skill ssh-experimentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hdu-ailab/EasyResearchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hdu-ailab/easyresearch/ssh-experiment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hdu-ailab/easyresearch/ssh-experiment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hdu-ailab/easyresearch/ssh-experiment.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01030 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00515 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
ssh-experiment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SSH Experiment Execution
Boundary
Read experiment first. Use this Skill only after Research Assistant configured
the project's single easyresearch.ssh object and verified the SSHFS mapping.
Experiment may test and run the connection through ssh-bash; it must not
reconfigure host, port, username, authentication, credential files, or mounts.
Never read credential files with Agent-visible tools. ssh-bash reads their
contents inside the daemon and returns only remote command output.
Freshness Guard
Before the first edit or launch, after reconnect, and after a long idle period:
- call
ssh-bashwithaction: "test"; - confirm exact-cwd
experiment_ssh/remains the configured mount; - repeat the owner-only marker round trip through
ssh-bash runand the local mount; and - query current compute availability.
If any check fails, preserve work and return blocked. Research Assistant must
repair/reconfigure the connection and mount before this child continues.
Editing And Artifact Paths
Edit through the verified local mount using Read/Edit/Write:
experiment_ssh/src/
experiment_ssh/external/
experiment_ssh/datasets/
experiment_ssh/outputs/
experiment_ssh/results/
experiment_ssh/logs/
experiment_ssh/experiment-record.md
This verified mount is the sole experiment root for SSH mode. Never create,
read, or write local-only experiments/ during the remote task and never create
an experiments/ child inside the mount. Keep raw/failed artifacts in
outputs/, formal promoted evidence in results/, and every command/status in
experiment-record.md.
Remote Commands
Use only the configured tool:
ssh-bash { action: "run", command: "<remote command>", timeout: <1-7200> }
The tool is cross-platform and provides complete bounded remote Bash; do not
invoke ssh, sshpass, a POSIX wrapper, PowerShell remoting, or a second
executable. Commands execute on the configured server and are not confined by
the tool to the project root, so every experiment command must explicitly enter
the configured remote project root first. Use conservative shell quoting and put
free-form experiment values in reviewed config files on the mounted workspace
rather than interpolating paper text or user-authored shell fragments.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 124 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 4f525bcf643d
ssh-experiment is a skill published in the GitHub repository hdu-ailab/EasyResearch (11 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,030 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
overleaf
Sync and manage Overleaf LaTeX projects from the command line. Pull projects locally, push changes back, compile PDFs, and download compile outputs like .bbl files for arXiv submissions. Use when working with LaTeX, Overleaf, academic papers, or arXiv.
academic-integrity-rewrite
Revise Chinese or English academic writing for lower unnecessary textual overlap while preserving meaning, evidence, numbers, equations, terminology, and citations. Use for 学术论文降重、查重后修改、重复段落重写、paraphrasing, similarity-report remediation, abstracts, literature reviews, methods, results, discussions, theses, and…
research-architect
Use when a user needs the end-to-end Research Architect workflow to turn a raw idea, user-designated accessible target reference paper, partial research materials, results, or an existing draft into an auditable research plan, draft, or revision path.
research-architect-audit
Use when reviewing, revising, or deciding whether to complete a Research Architect draft, especially when its reference adaptation, design, evidence, citations, claim boundaries, copying risk, or missing upstream artifacts need an auditable diagnosis.
research-architect-draft
Use when a Research Architect project has an evidence-ready spine, evidence and claim trail, citation support, terminology/object identities, and display logic that need to become an evidence-first, promise-aware first draft or audited revision.
research-architect-evidence
Use when executed research materials, results, observations, analyses, or draft claims need to become a Research Architect evidence bank, claim register, manuscript-wide display sequence, panel-level evidence map, and bounded interpretation trail.