Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT --skill feature-to-work-packetsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKITWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoatv2211/gamestudio-codexkit/feature-to-work-packets)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hoatv2211/gamestudio-codexkit/feature-to-work-packets"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hoatv2211/gamestudio-codexkit/feature-to-work-packets.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00944 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00472 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
feature-to-work-packets scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feature to Work Packets
Overview
Turn a testable feature spec into implementation units that can be owned, sequenced, reviewed, and verified without overlapping writes.
When to use
Use before multi-file, multi-subsystem, or multi-agent implementation when the specification is approved and dependency order matters.
When NOT to use
Do not use when the feature direction or specification remains unresolved, or when the task is a single-file micro-change.
Required inputs and context discovery
Require approved spec, repository map, generated/source relationships, subsystem owners, applicable instructions, dependency graph, risky files, verification commands, and unavailable tools.
Safety and risk level
Packet authoring is low-risk. Packets cannot grant destructive actions or overlapping write ownership, and they must preserve external and generated no-touch rules.
Workflow
- Map specification requirements to concrete subsystems and source-of-truth files. Completion criterion: generated outputs and external dependencies are distinguished from editable sources.
- Build the dependency graph and identify immediate blockers versus parallel sidecars. Completion criterion: ordering is based on real interfaces, not team preference.
- Create packets with one objective,
workflow_id, owner, repository phase, exact owned files, excluded files, inputs, outputs, authority handoff, and risks. For a progress-enabled KIT Goal, also require positive integerprogress_weight, required evidence kinds, optional or nullestimate_seconds: {low, high}, and timing policymax_active_timed_packets: 1. Completion criterion: no two concurrent packets own the same path or generated target, cross-project phases have one integration owner, and every opted-in progress packet has complete fields without inferred equal weights. - Attach focused and broader verification commands plus expected artifacts. Completion criterion: each packet has an objective completion check.
- Define integration and review packets owned by the orchestrator or reviewer. Completion criterion: shared registries and final verdict have a single owner.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +1 lines 69b10ad57ebf
- 8d ago First seen · 79 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 7d00c2a1120d
feature-to-work-packets is a skill published in the GitHub repository hoatv2211/GameStudio-CodexKIT (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 944 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
deep-discovery
Use when the user asks for deep discovery, 100-question brainstorming, idea interrogation, architecture stress testing, strategy vetting, weakness finding, hole-poking, exhaustive exploration, planning or auditing Codex plugins or skills, or pre-commitment review of a design, plan, strategy, architecture, product…
prewalk
Use when the user wants a coding task executed with a strong planner model first and a faster/cheaper executor model after the first successful implementation edit.
registry-broker-orchestrator
Use Registry Broker to discover and summon specialist agents for focused subtasks from inside Codex.
codex-sdd:customize
Guide for injecting custom MCP tools, skills, and hook points into the OpenSpec workflow for team-specific processes.
codex-sdd:validate
Check implementation alignment with specification, detect drift between planned design and actual code. Fourth phase of OpenSpec workflow.
codex-sdd:archive
Preserve change artifacts (proposal, design, tasks) into structured archive and update knowledge base. Final phase of OpenSpec workflow.